| List Price: | |
| Price: | $2.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details... |
| You Save: | $0.00(0.00%) |
| Binding: | Kindle Edition |
| EAN: | |
| Feature: | |
| Label: | Byliner |
| Publisher: | Byliner |
| Studio: | Byliner |
| Tags: | cups deceit greg mortenson humanitarian hero lost kindle single |
Editorial Reviews
Greg Mortenson has built a global reputation as a selfless humanitarian and children’s crusader, and he’s been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. He is also not what he appears to be. As acclaimed author Jon Krakauer discovered, Mortenson has not only fabricated substantial parts of his bestselling books Three Cups of Tea and Stones into Schools, but has also misused millions of dollars donated by unsuspecting admirers like Krakauer himself.
This is the tragic tale of good intentions gone very wrong.
100% of Jon Krakauer's proceeds from the sale of Three Cups of Deceit will be donated to the "Stop Girl Trafficking" project at the American Himalayan Foundation (www.himalayan-foundation.org/live/project/stopgirltrafficking).
This is the tragic tale of good intentions gone very wrong.
100% of Jon Krakauer's proceeds from the sale of Three Cups of Deceit will be donated to the "Stop Girl Trafficking" project at the American Himalayan Foundation (www.himalayan-foundation.org/live/project/stopgirltrafficking).
Related Reviews
Depressing but Deeply Necessary Expose
"Hell hath no fury like Jon Krakauer scorned"
The quote in the title comes from a journalist writing in the Seattle Times. It's important to note that Krakauer was a supporter of Mortenson's, and this report only came to be after numerous other private communication (all documented here) was ignored. Krakauer builds a damaging, fact-based case while still acknowledging the good work that Mortenson has done.
I wish it weren't so, but wishing something doesn't make it true. This report is well-documented, well-written, and sadly accurate.
I wish it weren't so, but wishing something doesn't make it true. This report is well-documented, well-written, and sadly accurate.
.....as meticulous as Jon Krakauer is in detailing where Greg Mortenson's account of his work in Afghanistan and Pakistan is shot full of holes, it's still best to read THREE CUPS OF DECEIT in tandem with Mortenson's own response to Krakauer's charges (which is in an interview with OUTSIDE magazine) and the response to Krakauer by Scott Darnsey, Mortenson's climbing partner back in the '90s when this all began (also in an interview with OUTSIDE). I suggest reading those as well NOT because they counteract the charge that Mortenson's story has problems---they don't really---but to have their perspective in addition to Krakauer's to then decide for yourself whether this was indeed a hustle by a shrewd con-man or a series of blunders made by a well-intentioned and dedicated man that ultimately undercut his achievements. I tend to be more convinced by Krakauer's reporting precisely because he does what Mortenson does not, namely SPECIFICALLY citing his sources. But even with the bloom off Mortenson's rose, I am not totally convinced that this was intended to be a hustle. Or, more accurately I suppose, I'd hate to have to come to that conclusion, though ultimately I may.
There is a cautionary moral to be drawn from all this, though: If you're going to go high-profile in promoting an agenda, you'd BETTER be prepared to be scrutinized and accountable for all that you do---especially when using other people's money.
There is a cautionary moral to be drawn from all this, though: If you're going to go high-profile in promoting an agenda, you'd BETTER be prepared to be scrutinized and accountable for all that you do---especially when using other people's money.
Journalism at its best, sadly about the worst
If Three Cups of Deceit had been written by anyone else or was any less well-documented, I truly don't think I would've believed it. There's no doubt for me, however, that this story is true.
The truth of Mortenson's deceit and the magnitude of it is clearly as much of a sock in the gut to the author as it is to me. Krakauer's writing is clear and compelling, with a very strong undercurrent of sadness and betrayal throughout the article. That feeling of betrayal mirrored my own as I read and became increasingly disillusioned as the facts piled up and revealed what a liar and thief Mortenson truly became, if he wasn't from the beginning.
One of the hardest things to take about this sham for me is the fact that it preyed on the hopes of both the givers and the receivers--buildings may have been built, but they weren't necessarily schools, and they weren't built for the children but for one man's ego and book sales. Ghost schools is a term that will haunt me for a long time.
Considering that I'm the member of a military family, this article leaves a doubly bitter taste in my mouth. My son has fought to bring peace and freedom to this area of the world, not to open the doors for predators who feed off their dreams--and education is one their top dreams. It simply makes me sick, and more sad than I can describe. Education means everything to people in the world who have been denied it. It's very hard for the average American to grasp just how deep a betrayal this is to those who haven't had the privilege of learning to read and write. We take this right for granted, not realizing how precious and valuable it is to those who do not have that right.
This is a huge, huge story and an excellent example of hard-hitting journalism at its best, done by a master. It's a an article that has me wanting to tell everybody they need to read it now, right now, don't wait another minute. I hope that CAI kicks Mortenson to the curb, or jail where he belongs, then cleans itself up and carries out the promise and the mission on which it was founded.
The truth of Mortenson's deceit and the magnitude of it is clearly as much of a sock in the gut to the author as it is to me. Krakauer's writing is clear and compelling, with a very strong undercurrent of sadness and betrayal throughout the article. That feeling of betrayal mirrored my own as I read and became increasingly disillusioned as the facts piled up and revealed what a liar and thief Mortenson truly became, if he wasn't from the beginning.
One of the hardest things to take about this sham for me is the fact that it preyed on the hopes of both the givers and the receivers--buildings may have been built, but they weren't necessarily schools, and they weren't built for the children but for one man's ego and book sales. Ghost schools is a term that will haunt me for a long time.
Considering that I'm the member of a military family, this article leaves a doubly bitter taste in my mouth. My son has fought to bring peace and freedom to this area of the world, not to open the doors for predators who feed off their dreams--and education is one their top dreams. It simply makes me sick, and more sad than I can describe. Education means everything to people in the world who have been denied it. It's very hard for the average American to grasp just how deep a betrayal this is to those who haven't had the privilege of learning to read and write. We take this right for granted, not realizing how precious and valuable it is to those who do not have that right.
This is a huge, huge story and an excellent example of hard-hitting journalism at its best, done by a master. It's a an article that has me wanting to tell everybody they need to read it now, right now, don't wait another minute. I hope that CAI kicks Mortenson to the curb, or jail where he belongs, then cleans itself up and carries out the promise and the mission on which it was founded.
I'd love to think that this expose was a fake, or that the author was simply out for his own gain. But Three Cups of Deceit is well researched and very detailed. Many of the things that may have nagged at you when you read Three Cups of Tea, may come back to you when you read this book including Mortenson's inexperience managing a large NGO, his inability to delegate and his unwillingness to conform to the norms of dealing with money in a nonprofit organization.
As someone who works for an NGO, I know that being careful and transparent with the money of donors is something to delegate to professionals who specialize in that. Its not exciting, fun or satisfying but if you don't do it you can be sure that sooner or later money will be wasted at best--stolen at worse.
Three Cups of Tea is a book I loved. I don't love this book but I respect Krakauer for bringing forward this depressing set of facts.
As someone who works for an NGO, I know that being careful and transparent with the money of donors is something to delegate to professionals who specialize in that. Its not exciting, fun or satisfying but if you don't do it you can be sure that sooner or later money will be wasted at best--stolen at worse.
Three Cups of Tea is a book I loved. I don't love this book but I respect Krakauer for bringing forward this depressing set of facts.
Are the "Three Cups of Tea" Half Empty or Half Full?
Are the "Three Cups of Tea" Half Empty or Half Full
First a disclosure: I am a long time donor to CAI. I also know Scott Darsney (Greg Mortenson's Climbing Partner on K2), we were both members of the Northeastern University Outing Club in the Late 80's.
It is obvious that Jon Krakauer would believe that the "Three Cups of Tea" are half empty if not completely empty. His book primary focuses on following three aspects the book " Three Cups of Tea", Greg Mortenson, and Greg Mortensons' organization the Central Asia Institute.
1. Inaccuracies of some of the stories in the book "Three cups of Tea"
2. Mismanagement of funds by Greg Mortenson though CAI
3. Reports of ghost schools that are have been built in Pakistan but not used.
I actually feel that the "Three Cups of Tea" are half full if not more. Although I am unhappy that many of the stories may have been distorted, either by Greg, David Relin or Viking Press, the most important part are the results of Greg's mission - Building Schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Jon spends the least amount of the book on the most important aspect of Greg's mission. Jon even states that tens of thousands of children (primary girls) have benefited from the dozens of schools that Greg has build. Jon only reports on a couple of ghost schools that are not used. Greg Mortenson has claimed to have built 170 schools. A few ghost schools out of 170 is a >90% success rate. Even a 50-60% success rate for any social development program carried out in one of the poorest regions with some of the lowest human rights records for women in the world would be a success.
Jon should have really focused on how well these schools are doing. He should have spent a few months traveling in the region to visit a statistically significant number of the schools
In regards to the mismanagement of CAI funds. Is obvious that this is the area where the CAI needs to most improvement. I find Jon's reports the most distressing part of the saga. However Jon primarily focuses on the finacial report of 2009. What about the other 14 financial reports from 1996 to 2011? He really should have analyzed all of them to give an accurate financial overview of the CAI. Also it would have helped to compare the CAI's funding efficiency with a range of other similar non profit entities to see how they all compare.
In addition, Jon said he attempted to get a response from Greg on the allegations. Greg said he would, but only after he completed his surgical procedure. Why didn't Jon wait a few months? This would have added another level of validity to the book.
Finally, there are now reports starting to surface that there is some distortion of the facts by Jon Krakauer himself. Scott Darsney has already reported publicly that Jon has misused his own words. You can find an interview with Scott in the following link. Also, just to be clear. I haven't had personal discussions with Scott Darsney yet.
Search for the outside magazine for the article "" Scott Darsney Questions the Accuracy and Fairness of "Three Cups of Deceit" "". Amazon will not let me publish a link here.
outsideonline.com/adventure/travel-ga-scott-darsney-greg-mortenson-three-cups-of-deceit-response-sidwcmdev_155822.html
In conclusion, I am giving this book two stars because I think Jon could have provided a much more thorough analysis. Also, the Outsider interview with Scott Darsney raises questions to the accuracy of Jon's portrayal of the facts, such that I begin to question Jon's motives. On the otherside, I would like to see Greg provide an accurate assessment of the schools and use of funds. He should note the failures as well as the successes. Also, what can and will be done to improve the effectiveness of CAI
Review Update
Since Jon Krakauer didn't not allow Greg Mortenson to respond to the allegations. I am providing a voice for Greg here, by providing the following links to the CAI website. Here are some examples. Greg will began to pay for his own travel expenses beginning Jan 2011, Explanations on why some schools are not in use, why he needs to use chartered flights. All of these are fairly legitimate reasons, that Jon has ignored. All of this information is on the Central Asia Institute website. I have attempted to post the links here but Amazon strips out my web links. Note the use of (dot) in the links
1. Financials - Income Tax Filings
ikat.org/about-cai/financials
2. Greg Mortenson's Response to 60 minutes/ jon Krakauer's Questions and other allegations.
library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102268008687-139/Q&A_from_Spring_JOH_051011(dot)pdf
library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102268008687-139/Q%26A_from_Spring_JOH_051011(dot)pdf
ikat.org/wp-includes/documents/CAI4-25-11Release.pdf
ikat.org/wp-includes/documents/gmresponse.pdf
First a disclosure: I am a long time donor to CAI. I also know Scott Darsney (Greg Mortenson's Climbing Partner on K2), we were both members of the Northeastern University Outing Club in the Late 80's.
It is obvious that Jon Krakauer would believe that the "Three Cups of Tea" are half empty if not completely empty. His book primary focuses on following three aspects the book " Three Cups of Tea", Greg Mortenson, and Greg Mortensons' organization the Central Asia Institute.
1. Inaccuracies of some of the stories in the book "Three cups of Tea"
2. Mismanagement of funds by Greg Mortenson though CAI
3. Reports of ghost schools that are have been built in Pakistan but not used.
I actually feel that the "Three Cups of Tea" are half full if not more. Although I am unhappy that many of the stories may have been distorted, either by Greg, David Relin or Viking Press, the most important part are the results of Greg's mission - Building Schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Jon spends the least amount of the book on the most important aspect of Greg's mission. Jon even states that tens of thousands of children (primary girls) have benefited from the dozens of schools that Greg has build. Jon only reports on a couple of ghost schools that are not used. Greg Mortenson has claimed to have built 170 schools. A few ghost schools out of 170 is a >90% success rate. Even a 50-60% success rate for any social development program carried out in one of the poorest regions with some of the lowest human rights records for women in the world would be a success.
Jon should have really focused on how well these schools are doing. He should have spent a few months traveling in the region to visit a statistically significant number of the schools
In regards to the mismanagement of CAI funds. Is obvious that this is the area where the CAI needs to most improvement. I find Jon's reports the most distressing part of the saga. However Jon primarily focuses on the finacial report of 2009. What about the other 14 financial reports from 1996 to 2011? He really should have analyzed all of them to give an accurate financial overview of the CAI. Also it would have helped to compare the CAI's funding efficiency with a range of other similar non profit entities to see how they all compare.
In addition, Jon said he attempted to get a response from Greg on the allegations. Greg said he would, but only after he completed his surgical procedure. Why didn't Jon wait a few months? This would have added another level of validity to the book.
Finally, there are now reports starting to surface that there is some distortion of the facts by Jon Krakauer himself. Scott Darsney has already reported publicly that Jon has misused his own words. You can find an interview with Scott in the following link. Also, just to be clear. I haven't had personal discussions with Scott Darsney yet.
Search for the outside magazine for the article "" Scott Darsney Questions the Accuracy and Fairness of "Three Cups of Deceit" "". Amazon will not let me publish a link here.
outsideonline.com/adventure/travel-ga-scott-darsney-greg-mortenson-three-cups-of-deceit-response-sidwcmdev_155822.html
In conclusion, I am giving this book two stars because I think Jon could have provided a much more thorough analysis. Also, the Outsider interview with Scott Darsney raises questions to the accuracy of Jon's portrayal of the facts, such that I begin to question Jon's motives. On the otherside, I would like to see Greg provide an accurate assessment of the schools and use of funds. He should note the failures as well as the successes. Also, what can and will be done to improve the effectiveness of CAI
Review Update
Since Jon Krakauer didn't not allow Greg Mortenson to respond to the allegations. I am providing a voice for Greg here, by providing the following links to the CAI website. Here are some examples. Greg will began to pay for his own travel expenses beginning Jan 2011, Explanations on why some schools are not in use, why he needs to use chartered flights. All of these are fairly legitimate reasons, that Jon has ignored. All of this information is on the Central Asia Institute website. I have attempted to post the links here but Amazon strips out my web links. Note the use of (dot) in the links
1. Financials - Income Tax Filings
ikat.org/about-cai/financials
2. Greg Mortenson's Response to 60 minutes/ jon Krakauer's Questions and other allegations.
library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102268008687-139/Q&A_from_Spring_JOH_051011(dot)pdf
library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102268008687-139/Q%26A_from_Spring_JOH_051011(dot)pdf
ikat.org/wp-includes/documents/CAI4-25-11Release.pdf
ikat.org/wp-includes/documents/gmresponse.pdf
Excellent reporting on a sad story
I want to be clear from the beginning: I have not read either of Mortenson's books or donated to his charity. I have read two of Krakauer's full-length books (Into the Wild (a college assignment) and Under the Banner of Heaven (a recommendation from several friends)) and really enjoyed both of them.
I read this booklet after seeing the "60 Minutes" report because I was interested in learning more. Only so much can be said in a fifteen-minute video about a story as complex as this one.
That said, I think this is a very well-reported booklet that shows Krakauer's journalistic chops. He points out far more inconsistencies and troubling behaviors on the part of Mortenson than the "60 Minutes" piece had time for, and he supports his claims very well. I hope that the editors/lawyers/executives at Penguin include this booklet in their review of Mortenson's books.
Of course, this booklet is about a topic that's difficult for everyone to think about: a celebrated figure has exaggerated himself and his accomplishments for his own benefit and for the benefit of others. In some cases, Mortenson lied; in some cases, he misused his charity's funds, and those facts are hard for us to deal with.
I like that Krakauer makes it clear that Mortenson has done plenty of good in the world and helped educate many children who would not otherwise been able to attend school; I also like that Krakauer suggests that CAI should continue its work, but be more organized and rigorous in its management practices.
If you want more than what you heard on "60 Minutes," this is what you're looking for.
I read this booklet after seeing the "60 Minutes" report because I was interested in learning more. Only so much can be said in a fifteen-minute video about a story as complex as this one.
That said, I think this is a very well-reported booklet that shows Krakauer's journalistic chops. He points out far more inconsistencies and troubling behaviors on the part of Mortenson than the "60 Minutes" piece had time for, and he supports his claims very well. I hope that the editors/lawyers/executives at Penguin include this booklet in their review of Mortenson's books.
Of course, this booklet is about a topic that's difficult for everyone to think about: a celebrated figure has exaggerated himself and his accomplishments for his own benefit and for the benefit of others. In some cases, Mortenson lied; in some cases, he misused his charity's funds, and those facts are hard for us to deal with.
I like that Krakauer makes it clear that Mortenson has done plenty of good in the world and helped educate many children who would not otherwise been able to attend school; I also like that Krakauer suggests that CAI should continue its work, but be more organized and rigorous in its management practices.
If you want more than what you heard on "60 Minutes," this is what you're looking for.
Investigative journalism at its best -- but don't like what he found
I read "Three Cups of Tea" very early on and was totally hooked. I talked to everyone who would listen to me about this great book and the great things Greg Mortenson was doing in Afghanistan. I had my book group read it and when he came to speak at my church last year, got tickets for all of us to go. It was a deeply moving story of hope and totally sucked me in - including my making monetary donations.
When my mother-in-law told me about the "60 Minutes" piece I was skeptical but didn't dismiss it. I went in search of more information and came across this. Imagine my surprise when I found out Jon Krakauer was the person doing the whistle blowing. I have tremendous respect for Jon Krakauer and his "Into Thin Air" is a book that had an enormous impact on me. If he is questioning the validity of the "Three Cups of Tea" narrative, I will listen.
I bought this 80-page investigative piece and read it all last night. After reading what Mr. Krakauer wrote, I have to believe him. These are not random accusations, but are backed up by the kind of excellent investigative journalism too often lacking in our sound-bite world. Documentation abounds throughout which shines a light on the deception and egomania of Mr. Mortenson. Hard facts are presented showing that many of the stories are fabricated in the "Three Cups of Tea" book and the Central Asia Institute (CAI) is an organization being run according to the whims of Mr. Mortenson. While not embezzling from it directly, the foundation is being used as a personal ATM (direct quote from one of the sources) to fund a lavish lifestyle and to promote the brand of Greg Morenson.
If you have any interest in learning the facts of the situation, beyond what you get in just a couple of minutes of television news coverage, I would encourage you to buy this. All I can say is I am deeply , deeply disappointed in what was uncovered, but have no question of the validity of Jon Krakauer's accusations. CAI has received their last dollar from me and, I suspect, from a lot of other folks too.
A HUGE "thank you" to Mr. Krakauer for excellent journalism and a very well-written piece. (even though it popped my bubble).
When my mother-in-law told me about the "60 Minutes" piece I was skeptical but didn't dismiss it. I went in search of more information and came across this. Imagine my surprise when I found out Jon Krakauer was the person doing the whistle blowing. I have tremendous respect for Jon Krakauer and his "Into Thin Air" is a book that had an enormous impact on me. If he is questioning the validity of the "Three Cups of Tea" narrative, I will listen.
I bought this 80-page investigative piece and read it all last night. After reading what Mr. Krakauer wrote, I have to believe him. These are not random accusations, but are backed up by the kind of excellent investigative journalism too often lacking in our sound-bite world. Documentation abounds throughout which shines a light on the deception and egomania of Mr. Mortenson. Hard facts are presented showing that many of the stories are fabricated in the "Three Cups of Tea" book and the Central Asia Institute (CAI) is an organization being run according to the whims of Mr. Mortenson. While not embezzling from it directly, the foundation is being used as a personal ATM (direct quote from one of the sources) to fund a lavish lifestyle and to promote the brand of Greg Morenson.
If you have any interest in learning the facts of the situation, beyond what you get in just a couple of minutes of television news coverage, I would encourage you to buy this. All I can say is I am deeply , deeply disappointed in what was uncovered, but have no question of the validity of Jon Krakauer's accusations. CAI has received their last dollar from me and, I suspect, from a lot of other folks too.
A HUGE "thank you" to Mr. Krakauer for excellent journalism and a very well-written piece. (even though it popped my bubble).
While I did not read 3 Cups of Tea, I was drawn to this book because of my interest in the work of nonprofits. The story is shocking - how Mortenson got away with so much over so many years is mind boggling (then again, one can only think about Madoff, Enron, and so many other examples of corrupt people being able to cover up their unethical behavior by a certain public persona). Why wasn't anything investigated when so many board members and staff members raised red flags??? If nothing else, the excellent journalism has to be used to motivate all involved in philanthropy to ask the hard questions about accountability. This is an important read.
If you're not caught up in the cult of personality, read this book
I read 3 Cups of Tea a couple years ago. At the time, I was skeptical of what I read because it read like a puff piece for someone wanting to be nominated for the Noble Peace Prize (twice in the book, Mortenson mentions the possibility he might be nominated). From beginning to end, it just seemed like Greg was a self promoter. He swooped in, stirred things up, planted some seeds then went on to the next project. Krakauer's critique of Mortenson's deceit and possible misuse of funds is detailed and long overdue. It may pop some peoples' bubbles, but that is reality. Mortenson simply lied, and despite good intentions, he's damaged a worthy cause and put his interests above those of the children he claimed to support.
Cult of Personality and Zero Credibility
This is a well thought out and documented article uncovering the lengths to which someone who has bought into their own hype will go to to maintain the illusion. The real problem with Mortensen and this article seems to be that no one is taken to task for enabling this guy, who seems to be out of his depth, and cracking the whip. Several times we are told of auditors and Board members who try and reign the man in. They ask for the most basic of accounting controls, like receipts and other information, to account for millions of dollars this guys spends. What does he spend it on, nobody knows but him, he won't say or provide receipts according to those around him... It smacks of fraud. Also to hear this non-profit has been allowed to operate without filing timely, and accurate, tax returns is a crime in itself. The government meddles in many issues, but this is one we actually expect them to be responsible for. To allow a designated charity to operate like this without immediately removing their tax-exempt status is beyond the pale.
To everyone who loves Mortensen and what he does and defends him so ferociously on this site, I say this and I say it sternly : Separate the man from the message. The message is great, schools for kids who need them. The man is not, apparently he is absconding with your money and thumbing his nose at you to boot. Realize that for every dollar he takes form the charity, which he has taken millions apparently and has refused to account for, that is one less dollar spent on those kids and schools. These do not appear to be the actions of a transparent and exceptional philanthropist. The actions described in this article are of a basic swindler, taking advantage of your good intentions to line his own nest. If you wish to be angered, be angered about that.
To everyone who loves Mortensen and what he does and defends him so ferociously on this site, I say this and I say it sternly : Separate the man from the message. The message is great, schools for kids who need them. The man is not, apparently he is absconding with your money and thumbing his nose at you to boot. Realize that for every dollar he takes form the charity, which he has taken millions apparently and has refused to account for, that is one less dollar spent on those kids and schools. These do not appear to be the actions of a transparent and exceptional philanthropist. The actions described in this article are of a basic swindler, taking advantage of your good intentions to line his own nest. If you wish to be angered, be angered about that.
Critical expose... how should we respond?
I suspect many of you have heard about the issue regarding Greg Mortenson's best-selling book, Three Cups Of Tea. Briefly, he is being accused of 1) making up significant parts of the story, 2) not building or staffing many schools claimed to be running, 3) mismanaging the Pennies For Schools program, and 4) inappropriately co-mingling his personal funds with the funds for the Central Asia Institute, particularly in regards to the CAI paying for all of his book promotion and lectures, but Mortenson keeping all royalties and speaking fees personally.
Yikes!
There was a 60 Minutes investigation based on this e-book, "Three Cups Of Deceit," by Jon Krakauer. Krakauer has authored other critical, investigative books, such as Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman, Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, and Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster.
Many people in the service-learning, community engagement, and philanthropy worlds have promoted and utilized both this book and Greg Mortenson. What is their responsibility in investigating these charges and promoting discussion of them on our campuses and in our towns? Can they ask for their speaking fees back? Will Krakauer get equal billing to tell his side of the story? Will the issue be swept under the rug because we want to hear good and uplifting stories (Krakauer's argument in Where Men Win Glory)?
I've also read Mountains Beyond Mountains: The Quest of Dr. Paul Farmer, a Man Who Would Cure the World. In Mountains Beyond Mountains, Paul Farmer is not a perfect person. Why didn't Farmer's work get the PR that Mortenson's did? Is it because we are more enamored with the Middle East than with multi-drug resistant TB, HIV/AIDS, and desperately poor people on Haiti?
We need to turn the inner eye to ourselves as much as we turn it outward to Greg Mortenson. In Three Cups Of Deceit, Krakauer is illuminating.
Yikes!
There was a 60 Minutes investigation based on this e-book, "Three Cups Of Deceit," by Jon Krakauer. Krakauer has authored other critical, investigative books, such as Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman, Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, and Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster.
Many people in the service-learning, community engagement, and philanthropy worlds have promoted and utilized both this book and Greg Mortenson. What is their responsibility in investigating these charges and promoting discussion of them on our campuses and in our towns? Can they ask for their speaking fees back? Will Krakauer get equal billing to tell his side of the story? Will the issue be swept under the rug because we want to hear good and uplifting stories (Krakauer's argument in Where Men Win Glory)?
I've also read Mountains Beyond Mountains: The Quest of Dr. Paul Farmer, a Man Who Would Cure the World. In Mountains Beyond Mountains, Paul Farmer is not a perfect person. Why didn't Farmer's work get the PR that Mortenson's did? Is it because we are more enamored with the Middle East than with multi-drug resistant TB, HIV/AIDS, and desperately poor people on Haiti?
We need to turn the inner eye to ourselves as much as we turn it outward to Greg Mortenson. In Three Cups Of Deceit, Krakauer is illuminating.
A great example of a new form of journalism
Not a book and not a magazine article either.
Hard hitting, timely, clear and engaging. I think this is yet another brick in the building of a new way to share great writing. Well done.
Hard hitting, timely, clear and engaging. I think this is yet another brick in the building of a new way to share great writing. Well done.
Greg Mortenson makes over 160 public appearances each year promoting his Central Asia Institute (CAI) and its school-building efforts. The CAI received $23 million in 2010 donations alone, and Mortenson's first book ('Three Cups of Tea') has over 5 million copies in circulation. His book has been widely distributed to American officers stationed in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Mortenson's theme - terrorism can be eradicated by educating children in poor societies.
Jon Krakauer, however, begs to differ with Mortenson's account of his actions and accomplishments. Differences include Mortenson's report of traveling within Pakistan early in the 1990s, being kidnapped by the Taliban (those in the alleged photos have been identified as government workers; in one Mortenson is actually holding the AK-47), the actual numbers of schools built and operating, etc. Krakauer reports that Mortenson is paid up to $30,000/appearance (he keeps), receives millions more from book royalties (he keeps), and also has his book ads and promotion expenses paid for by CAI. A CPA found that fund raising and administrative costs took over 50% of CAI expenses in a recent year. Krakauer also contends that the majority of schools CAI has established in Afghanistan and Pakistan are in areas where the Taliban has/had little/no influence. Also a significant number of these schools exist only on paper (pupils enrolled and expense statistics are manufactured), and many other have been abandoned.
CAI has seen a large number of resignations over Mortenson's failure to properly account for or control expenses. Those resigning include a board majority, his first CFO, and his first Director of Development.
At the end of 'Three Cups of Deceit' Krakauer states that Mortenson has done much good, but that he has also largely destroyed the credibility of his CAI.
Jon Krakauer, however, begs to differ with Mortenson's account of his actions and accomplishments. Differences include Mortenson's report of traveling within Pakistan early in the 1990s, being kidnapped by the Taliban (those in the alleged photos have been identified as government workers; in one Mortenson is actually holding the AK-47), the actual numbers of schools built and operating, etc. Krakauer reports that Mortenson is paid up to $30,000/appearance (he keeps), receives millions more from book royalties (he keeps), and also has his book ads and promotion expenses paid for by CAI. A CPA found that fund raising and administrative costs took over 50% of CAI expenses in a recent year. Krakauer also contends that the majority of schools CAI has established in Afghanistan and Pakistan are in areas where the Taliban has/had little/no influence. Also a significant number of these schools exist only on paper (pupils enrolled and expense statistics are manufactured), and many other have been abandoned.
CAI has seen a large number of resignations over Mortenson's failure to properly account for or control expenses. Those resigning include a board majority, his first CFO, and his first Director of Development.
At the end of 'Three Cups of Deceit' Krakauer states that Mortenson has done much good, but that he has also largely destroyed the credibility of his CAI.
The Lies Don't Justify the Ends
I am not going to pass judgement on Jon Krakauer as a person or whether his motives are pure. However, I think readers who blindly cite motive miss the larger reality of all the damning evidence that supports the premise of "Three Cups of Deceit" --- that Greg Mortenson embellished and fabricated many facts to make a more compelling read and prevented proper oversight of the non-profit CAI.
Krakauer brings a lot of facts to the table from a variety of sources, many who are critical players in Greg Mortenson's account in "Three Cups of Tea". If there is a vendetta, then many people, not just Krakauer are in on the vendetta and it is a smear job of Mortenson on an epic scale. Krakauer gave Mortenson ample opportunity to rebut the story and surprisingly Mortenson bailed on him at the last minute. Having read his subsequent interview in Outside Magazine, I find Mortenson lacking credibility by dismissing many of the discrepancies, blaming others and casually avoiding directly denying many of the claims. Certainly, after captivating millions with his story, there will always be those who choose to believe despite the evidence, but it should not be a surprise in this day and age that such fabrication would come to light or that an author would do something like this --- did we forget James Frey.
Maybe the sad reality is that Mortenson could not have raised the money and done as much good without an embellished story, but that does excuse what he did or justify it. It would be a better reflection on him and maybe his goals if he admitted his failures (fabrications and mis-deeds like bulk buying of books from his non-profit to prop up best seller rankings). His reputation has been rightfully tarnished, maybe he can save his ambition of educating young Afghan children.
Krakauer brings a lot of facts to the table from a variety of sources, many who are critical players in Greg Mortenson's account in "Three Cups of Tea". If there is a vendetta, then many people, not just Krakauer are in on the vendetta and it is a smear job of Mortenson on an epic scale. Krakauer gave Mortenson ample opportunity to rebut the story and surprisingly Mortenson bailed on him at the last minute. Having read his subsequent interview in Outside Magazine, I find Mortenson lacking credibility by dismissing many of the discrepancies, blaming others and casually avoiding directly denying many of the claims. Certainly, after captivating millions with his story, there will always be those who choose to believe despite the evidence, but it should not be a surprise in this day and age that such fabrication would come to light or that an author would do something like this --- did we forget James Frey.
Maybe the sad reality is that Mortenson could not have raised the money and done as much good without an embellished story, but that does excuse what he did or justify it. It would be a better reflection on him and maybe his goals if he admitted his failures (fabrications and mis-deeds like bulk buying of books from his non-profit to prop up best seller rankings). His reputation has been rightfully tarnished, maybe he can save his ambition of educating young Afghan children.
"Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive"
And apparently Mr. Mortenson practiced quite a bit, much to the detriment of many. Does the fact that he has done some good, automatically exonerate him of his fiscal irresponsibility? I think not. So what if he didn't steal it ALL. How are the chartered jets and deluxe accommodations for him and his entourage any less cynical and reprehensible than AIG's 2008 corporate junkets, after the company was bailed out by taxpayers? In some ways it is much worse. I read Mr. Mortenson's book "Three Cups of Tea" with 5th grade students last year, and we discussed his compassion and altruism. The kids came away feeling like they had a real hero to admire and emulate. Think of all the children who participated in the Pennies for Peace Program. Imagine their disappointment.
Mr. Krakauer is a respected journalist, who is a joy to read. I do not feel that the fact that he was personally involved necessarily means that this is a personal vendetta, as some reviewers have claimed. I think Mr. Krakauer has used his position as a journalist to stop this clearly cynical megalomaniac from continuing to lie with impunity and, thereby, profit financially on the compassion of others.
And apparently Mr. Mortenson practiced quite a bit, much to the detriment of many. Does the fact that he has done some good, automatically exonerate him of his fiscal irresponsibility? I think not. So what if he didn't steal it ALL. How are the chartered jets and deluxe accommodations for him and his entourage any less cynical and reprehensible than AIG's 2008 corporate junkets, after the company was bailed out by taxpayers? In some ways it is much worse. I read Mr. Mortenson's book "Three Cups of Tea" with 5th grade students last year, and we discussed his compassion and altruism. The kids came away feeling like they had a real hero to admire and emulate. Think of all the children who participated in the Pennies for Peace Program. Imagine their disappointment.
Mr. Krakauer is a respected journalist, who is a joy to read. I do not feel that the fact that he was personally involved necessarily means that this is a personal vendetta, as some reviewers have claimed. I think Mr. Krakauer has used his position as a journalist to stop this clearly cynical megalomaniac from continuing to lie with impunity and, thereby, profit financially on the compassion of others.
Finally! The fiction is exposed.
I read "Three Cups of Tea" about 2.5 years ago. I hated it and wrote a 1-star (can't give it lower) review on Amazon.com. I wrote my many points as to why I didn't like the book. I didn't believe it and I thought that Greg Mortenson was irresponsible with the money people had donated to build schools. Since reading the book and writing that review I have also expressed this view verbally to many people. They never liked what I had to say, because they thought Mortenson was some kind of hero. They thought he was amazing beyond belief. And that part was right!
I was thrilled to see this book, "Three Cups of Deceit." I am so glad that it has been written and Mortenson has been exposed. I could not put this book down after buying it. I just had to keep going and reading about all the deceit and fiction Mortenson's book and story was really about.
Two thumbs way up for this book, which exposes the fiction that has been used to get people to open their wallets and give a lot of money.
Anyone who has read "Three Cups of Tea" owes it to themselves to read "Three Cups of Deceit." Anyone that has donated money to this sham owes it to themselves to learn where it really went. It's a shame that Mortenson has gotten away with all this up to this point. I hope this exposure makes people think twice about giving money and that he is held accountable for his actions.
I was thrilled to see this book, "Three Cups of Deceit." I am so glad that it has been written and Mortenson has been exposed. I could not put this book down after buying it. I just had to keep going and reading about all the deceit and fiction Mortenson's book and story was really about.
Two thumbs way up for this book, which exposes the fiction that has been used to get people to open their wallets and give a lot of money.
Anyone who has read "Three Cups of Tea" owes it to themselves to read "Three Cups of Deceit." Anyone that has donated money to this sham owes it to themselves to learn where it really went. It's a shame that Mortenson has gotten away with all this up to this point. I hope this exposure makes people think twice about giving money and that he is held accountable for his actions.
Mortenson's Lies Soiled my Mother's Legacy
My mother passed three years ago. Why is this important to my review? Because my mother died suddenly of a brain tumor, after a life as a children's educator and advocate for abused children. She was so taken by Mortenson's tales in "Three Cups of Tea," that she left her life savings to his organization, CAI. She also set up a trust before she passed where friends and family could donate in her memory to Mortenson's cause.
Upon hearing of Krakauer's essay, and the "60 Minutes" story, I began to research all I could. I've read Mortenson's response in "Outside" as well as that of his climbing partner, which do little to call into question Krakauer's expose.
To me, this is an important story that rings very true. As someone who has met Mortenson, heard him speak and considered both sides, I'd give much more weight to Krakauer's essay than seems to be given by most of his die hard fans.
I know if my mother were alive, she would be ashamed of Mortenson. She also wouldn't hold on vociferously to his story and would take being bilked standing up and ready to make it right. I intend to do so for her, and would urge those fans of Mortenson's to truly examine their motivations to defend him.
This is a must read- not only for the sake of those who have been had, but for all who want a look at what happens when ego takes the lead on a nonprofit, and when someone is more comfortable with the person they wish to portray than the one they are.
Mortenson should be ashamed.
Upon hearing of Krakauer's essay, and the "60 Minutes" story, I began to research all I could. I've read Mortenson's response in "Outside" as well as that of his climbing partner, which do little to call into question Krakauer's expose.
To me, this is an important story that rings very true. As someone who has met Mortenson, heard him speak and considered both sides, I'd give much more weight to Krakauer's essay than seems to be given by most of his die hard fans.
I know if my mother were alive, she would be ashamed of Mortenson. She also wouldn't hold on vociferously to his story and would take being bilked standing up and ready to make it right. I intend to do so for her, and would urge those fans of Mortenson's to truly examine their motivations to defend him.
This is a must read- not only for the sake of those who have been had, but for all who want a look at what happens when ego takes the lead on a nonprofit, and when someone is more comfortable with the person they wish to portray than the one they are.
Mortenson should be ashamed.
When I read "Three Cups of Tea" two years ago, I was entranced by the tale and by his interesting writing style. Yet, I was puzzled. It sounded like he brought in a lot of money, but then suddenly had none. Now, I know why!
I love the way this deceit was uncovered and reported by Mr. Krakauer. His unravelling of the layers was documented and corroberated by third parties where able. Interesting read and hopefully Greg will step aside and allow others who are ethical take the reins of the organization. Great investigation and reporting!
A damning indictment that it will be hard to rebut
This story is still playing out as I write this, which makes assigning stars chancy, but Krakauer has built a formidable case, and one that can be checked by a third party interviewing his named sources. After reading Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Promote Peace . . . One School at a Time, I find it very credible that the organization's books are a mess, and that Mortenson has failed to keep needed documentation. This goes on to makes even worse accusations: that Mortenson isn't merely disorganized, he actively thwarts attempts to keep accounts of his and his employees spending, and that he is using the Institute's money for personal expenses. I've read some of the defenses, but I'm not impressed. I personally cannot see how sending Mortenson around to do his talks can be considered "program" and not fundraising, particularly if it is handled in the manner that Krakauer alleges.
The piece is made even more powerful by Krakauer's previous support of Mortenson and the Central Asia Institute (CAI): he reports that he donated $75,000 and used to help with promotion. He also tells us that CAI has truly done good things, but that they have not followed the law for legal charity: they haven't performed audits, there is a mingling of personal funds, and much money has been spent on "outreach" that directly benefits Mortenson and only indirectly the CAI. The CAI has actually spent more money paying for book tours and speeches by Mortenson than it has spent on schools.
As to Mortenson's honesty: he now says in his interview with Outside magazine that he spent a few hours in Korphe in 1993, not an unspecified number of days. I cannot see how his very different account in Three Cups of Tea can be explained by combining two trips into one, or a vagueness with regard to time by the Balti. It was Mortenson telling the story, after all. He ought to be able to remember whether he spent a number of days there or a few hours. His climbing partner, Scott Darsney certainly ought to be able to remember if he went missing for days. If anything, his argument about the Balti undermines his efforts to call them as witnesses. It will be interesting to hear what co-author David Oliver Relin has to say, since Mortenson is trying to make him out as the bad guy who misled poor naive Greg.
This is a story that I will be following with great interest.
The piece is made even more powerful by Krakauer's previous support of Mortenson and the Central Asia Institute (CAI): he reports that he donated $75,000 and used to help with promotion. He also tells us that CAI has truly done good things, but that they have not followed the law for legal charity: they haven't performed audits, there is a mingling of personal funds, and much money has been spent on "outreach" that directly benefits Mortenson and only indirectly the CAI. The CAI has actually spent more money paying for book tours and speeches by Mortenson than it has spent on schools.
As to Mortenson's honesty: he now says in his interview with Outside magazine that he spent a few hours in Korphe in 1993, not an unspecified number of days. I cannot see how his very different account in Three Cups of Tea can be explained by combining two trips into one, or a vagueness with regard to time by the Balti. It was Mortenson telling the story, after all. He ought to be able to remember whether he spent a number of days there or a few hours. His climbing partner, Scott Darsney certainly ought to be able to remember if he went missing for days. If anything, his argument about the Balti undermines his efforts to call them as witnesses. It will be interesting to hear what co-author David Oliver Relin has to say, since Mortenson is trying to make him out as the bad guy who misled poor naive Greg.
This is a story that I will be following with great interest.
I won't lie - I'm a fan of Jon Krakauer. I love his work - specifically "Into The Wild", "Into Thin Air" and "Under The Banner Of Heaven". I found this investigative piece to be outstanding. He tackles the questions he has in his own mind regarding Greg Mortenson, and shares his insight with us.
I found that Krakaur's personal stake in this story to be a nice driving factor, with him looking for the truth regarding Greg Mortenson and his charity, and the claims Greg made in his book. As Jon Krakaur says - he'd introduced Greg at speaking engagements, he'd contributed his own personal money to Greg's charity. Jon Krakaur had questions and Jon Krakaur found answers, as any good investigative journalist will do. He spoke to the people involved, he spoke to board members, he delved into records.
"Three Cups of Deceit" is a clear and clean report on what turns out to be Greg Mortenson's lies, and what I personally feel are Greg Mortenson's fraudulent practices with regards to CAI.
Greg Mortenson has since responded - he gave an interview to Outside Magazine. Basically, he claims that his co-author of "Three Cups of Tea" took some literary license with describing Greg's own tales, but generally he claims his story is true. That is specifically hard to believe since Krakauer has tracked down people involved with Greg and they categorically deny events took place as Greg claims. Greg also has indicated that he's NOW paying for his own travel. Now. As in, since January 2011.
Hopefully, this outstanding reporting will compell Greg Mortenson and the Board at CAI to open their books to a full accounting: to a precise, transparent and detailed ledger of what money went where and for what.
I found that Krakaur's personal stake in this story to be a nice driving factor, with him looking for the truth regarding Greg Mortenson and his charity, and the claims Greg made in his book. As Jon Krakaur says - he'd introduced Greg at speaking engagements, he'd contributed his own personal money to Greg's charity. Jon Krakaur had questions and Jon Krakaur found answers, as any good investigative journalist will do. He spoke to the people involved, he spoke to board members, he delved into records.
"Three Cups of Deceit" is a clear and clean report on what turns out to be Greg Mortenson's lies, and what I personally feel are Greg Mortenson's fraudulent practices with regards to CAI.
Greg Mortenson has since responded - he gave an interview to Outside Magazine. Basically, he claims that his co-author of "Three Cups of Tea" took some literary license with describing Greg's own tales, but generally he claims his story is true. That is specifically hard to believe since Krakauer has tracked down people involved with Greg and they categorically deny events took place as Greg claims. Greg also has indicated that he's NOW paying for his own travel. Now. As in, since January 2011.
Hopefully, this outstanding reporting will compell Greg Mortenson and the Board at CAI to open their books to a full accounting: to a precise, transparent and detailed ledger of what money went where and for what.
The Ends Don't Justify the Means
First off, I have read "Three Cups of Tea" before any of this negative publicity came out. I thoroughly enjoyed it and would quickly have recommended it to anyone who asked. One of the most compelling things about it was the story itself and the experiences Mortenson relayed in it helped give it credibility. I have not read his second book.
I saw the 60 Minutes story and it did raise concerns about the book, but I was not totally convinced. Since then I have seen several other articles that also raised similar questions as the 60 Minutes interview. I have also seen some rebuttals of the charges against Mortenson, but I've found them all to be lacking. They give generalities about why Mortenson is not lying or dishonest or just mistaken, but most give nothing that concrete, though maybe a few. Mostly they just "no he couldn't have lied, Greg's a great guy and he's done all this great work" sort of stuff. The website Outside Online did interview Mortenson for his rebuttal of these charges and even in this Mortenson does admit to some "license" with the story. For one example, in "Three Cups of Tea" Greg gives the impression he was in Korphe for many days resting up after his weakened condition from the K2 attempt and the villagers basically nursed him back to health...a very touching narrative that is meant to show how generous and hospitable the people were and was sort of the "defining moment" of when he decided to go on this altruistic path of building schools in all these remote places. But even Mortenson now admits he was only there a few hours and that the same day he met back up with his climbing partner Scott Darsney in another town. Hardly enough time to be nursed back to health.
Outside Online also interviewed Scott Darsney and he did say he felt Krakauer took some of what he said out of context and that it was "certainly plausible" Greg could have (not did) ended up in the village of Korphe after his failed K2 attempt despite Krakauer saying he did not. I tried posting a link but I guess Amazon doesn't like that.
But shortly thereafter Outside Online actually posted this blog which indicated that after further research it did NOT seem likely Mortenson ended up in Korphe after his failed K2 climb. Again, I can't post the link but you can go to the Outside Online website and search the blog on April 27, 2011 by Grayson Schaffer titled "Can't Get There From Here." (it also has a link in the blog to the Darsney interview mentioned above as well as Mortenson's rebuttal to Krakauer)
One excerpt from the above article - "...Outside has learned that Mortenson's revised Korphe account has serious problems. Even if Mortenson had got lost between Korofong and Askole, Outside now believes it would have been nearly impossible to end up in Korphe. What's more, we've found a troubling lack of documentation regarding Mortenson's climbing record in Nepal."
So anyway, as for this book itself, it is very thorough and well documented. You get names of people Krakauer interviewed. This is not just one or two disgruntled people, this is person after person including former CAI board members, associates in Pakistan and Afghanistan, well-known mountaineers, and even a foreign researcher who has spent many years in Afghanistan and the surrounding area with one of the tribes Mortenson proudly parades in his second book. Krakauer lists names for almost all of them so it's easy enough to verify who they are if that's what you feel you need to do. He even has a picture of Mortenson gleefully holding an AK-47 with a group of men...men who Mortenson actually showed a picture of in his book and said they were Taliban who kidnapped him for eight days. I guess kidnappers let their abductees play with their weapons now.
Even if you take into account the "creative license" of writing and that perhaps there was just some "different points of view" of certain events, Mortenson's stories are still full of holes. But what is really eye-opening is that CAI pays for ALL of Mortenson's trips and advertising to promote his books...and yet they receive absolutely no proceeds from the book itself. And does Greg fly commercial? No, he has charter jets take him everywhere. Additionally, Mortenson even used CAI money to buy tens of thousands of copies of his book from retailers that he handed out at some of his conferences. He buys from retailers because it a.) allows him to receive the royalties from it and b.)it contributes to the number used to rank him on the bestseller list...neither of these things would happen if he got them directly from the publisher (for much less money). And the real icing on the cake is that over all the years, one of the most common complaints from those who resigned from CAI was that Mortenson absolutely refused to ever provide basic accountability information, like receipts or expense reports for what he was doing with the money.
I won't even get into the question of how effective (or ineffective) the schools CAI has or has claimed to have built. That certainly does not bode well for Mortenson either.
The bottom line is that CAI seems to be a organization that has a noble goal and Mortenson may very well have started out with good intentions, but these do not justify Mortenson's lying or his financial irresponsibility. My advice would be to stop giving to CAI until Mortenson steps down and a new board of directors takes over that is willing to be organized and transparent. When that happens CAI will again be a worthwhile organization to support. Until that time there are plenty of other noble charities to support that let you know exactly where your money goes.
I saw the 60 Minutes story and it did raise concerns about the book, but I was not totally convinced. Since then I have seen several other articles that also raised similar questions as the 60 Minutes interview. I have also seen some rebuttals of the charges against Mortenson, but I've found them all to be lacking. They give generalities about why Mortenson is not lying or dishonest or just mistaken, but most give nothing that concrete, though maybe a few. Mostly they just "no he couldn't have lied, Greg's a great guy and he's done all this great work" sort of stuff. The website Outside Online did interview Mortenson for his rebuttal of these charges and even in this Mortenson does admit to some "license" with the story. For one example, in "Three Cups of Tea" Greg gives the impression he was in Korphe for many days resting up after his weakened condition from the K2 attempt and the villagers basically nursed him back to health...a very touching narrative that is meant to show how generous and hospitable the people were and was sort of the "defining moment" of when he decided to go on this altruistic path of building schools in all these remote places. But even Mortenson now admits he was only there a few hours and that the same day he met back up with his climbing partner Scott Darsney in another town. Hardly enough time to be nursed back to health.
Outside Online also interviewed Scott Darsney and he did say he felt Krakauer took some of what he said out of context and that it was "certainly plausible" Greg could have (not did) ended up in the village of Korphe after his failed K2 attempt despite Krakauer saying he did not. I tried posting a link but I guess Amazon doesn't like that.
But shortly thereafter Outside Online actually posted this blog which indicated that after further research it did NOT seem likely Mortenson ended up in Korphe after his failed K2 climb. Again, I can't post the link but you can go to the Outside Online website and search the blog on April 27, 2011 by Grayson Schaffer titled "Can't Get There From Here." (it also has a link in the blog to the Darsney interview mentioned above as well as Mortenson's rebuttal to Krakauer)
One excerpt from the above article - "...Outside has learned that Mortenson's revised Korphe account has serious problems. Even if Mortenson had got lost between Korofong and Askole, Outside now believes it would have been nearly impossible to end up in Korphe. What's more, we've found a troubling lack of documentation regarding Mortenson's climbing record in Nepal."
So anyway, as for this book itself, it is very thorough and well documented. You get names of people Krakauer interviewed. This is not just one or two disgruntled people, this is person after person including former CAI board members, associates in Pakistan and Afghanistan, well-known mountaineers, and even a foreign researcher who has spent many years in Afghanistan and the surrounding area with one of the tribes Mortenson proudly parades in his second book. Krakauer lists names for almost all of them so it's easy enough to verify who they are if that's what you feel you need to do. He even has a picture of Mortenson gleefully holding an AK-47 with a group of men...men who Mortenson actually showed a picture of in his book and said they were Taliban who kidnapped him for eight days. I guess kidnappers let their abductees play with their weapons now.
Even if you take into account the "creative license" of writing and that perhaps there was just some "different points of view" of certain events, Mortenson's stories are still full of holes. But what is really eye-opening is that CAI pays for ALL of Mortenson's trips and advertising to promote his books...and yet they receive absolutely no proceeds from the book itself. And does Greg fly commercial? No, he has charter jets take him everywhere. Additionally, Mortenson even used CAI money to buy tens of thousands of copies of his book from retailers that he handed out at some of his conferences. He buys from retailers because it a.) allows him to receive the royalties from it and b.)it contributes to the number used to rank him on the bestseller list...neither of these things would happen if he got them directly from the publisher (for much less money). And the real icing on the cake is that over all the years, one of the most common complaints from those who resigned from CAI was that Mortenson absolutely refused to ever provide basic accountability information, like receipts or expense reports for what he was doing with the money.
I won't even get into the question of how effective (or ineffective) the schools CAI has or has claimed to have built. That certainly does not bode well for Mortenson either.
The bottom line is that CAI seems to be a organization that has a noble goal and Mortenson may very well have started out with good intentions, but these do not justify Mortenson's lying or his financial irresponsibility. My advice would be to stop giving to CAI until Mortenson steps down and a new board of directors takes over that is willing to be organized and transparent. When that happens CAI will again be a worthwhile organization to support. Until that time there are plenty of other noble charities to support that let you know exactly where your money goes.
Very Depressing, But Glad that I Read It
I have read both of Mortenson's books, and given several copies of each as gifts, as well as donated to CAI, as I (perhaps naively) bought Mortenson's account "hook, line, and sinker." I really admired his selfless heroism and determination to bring education to remote areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan and make an enormous difference in people's lives. After reading Krakauer's Kindle Single, even if he did have an axe to grind, as some here allege, he builds a very convincing argument that Mortenson lied about not just things that we likely could forgive (making the "creation story" more dramatic by fictionalizing the account of how he discovered the first village in which he built a school, and making himself seem more heroic by making up the account of his abduction), but about much more serious and egregious matters, such as whether or not he has actually built the schools he has claimed to build, if the buildings are being used for schools, and if the monies donated to CAI or to other sponsored programs are going toward the stated mission. This is not to say that building and staffing even one school in one of these remote locales isn't a great accomplishment and more than most of us will ever achieve, but the ends just do not justify the means, Of course, it's a harsh lesson to learn that one's hero has feet of clay. I can't help but wonder if Mortenson's illness is in part due to the stress of living with such duplicity. It may take a while, but one day Mortenson may want to thank Krakauer for freeing him from this morass of lies and deceit. Although reading this book made me sadder than I can say, I am glad that Krakauer ripped the veil from my eyes.
A stunning expose...backed up with facts
In the years since it was published, I have read "Three Cups of Tea" in bits and pieces, but have always had to put it down after a certain point because of the book's overwhelming theme of self congratulation and, frankly, the absurdity of the tales it contains. The account given here of Mortenson's increasing lack of accountability regarding CAI is a factual one, however painful it may be for Mortenson's devotees to admit. Rather than directing anger at Krakauer, demand answers from Mortenson regarding these charges. Thus far, Mortenson has provided no factual info or documents to rebut this expose.
I had seen the 60 Minutes report raising questions on the veracity of Greg Mortenson's compelling narrative and the finances of his nonprofit organization - and I wanted to know more. Jon Krakauer methodical reporting into Mortenson and his organization spans just 75 pages - but it is a convincing indictment Mortenson, his honesty and his business practices.
I downloaded it and then read it straight through to the end. I do not doubt a word of Krakauer's findings - but now doubt everything Mortenson has ever said or written. How could this have gone on so long with so many people defecting from the Board of Directors and elsewhere while the donors continued pouring in money to this scam. So sad.
I'm so glad that I didn't read Greg Mortenson's book before reading this single. It was heartbreaking enough reading it without having read the book. It really kind of turns your stomach . Of course it helps that I am a huge Krakauer fan and he has always shown research in his work. And he does a lot of research here.
Krakauer uncovers so many cracks in Mortenson's story that separates fact from fiction. Sadly there seems to be very little truth in Mortenson's account and a lot of facts to back up Krakauer's account.
This is a great single. Actually it's the best single I've read. I enjoyed it--as much as you can enjoy someone being eviserated. It was well written and well researched.
Note to charity workers: DON'T TAKE PRIVATE JETS--it's tacky and exudes hubris, not charity.
Krakauer uncovers so many cracks in Mortenson's story that separates fact from fiction. Sadly there seems to be very little truth in Mortenson's account and a lot of facts to back up Krakauer's account.
This is a great single. Actually it's the best single I've read. I enjoyed it--as much as you can enjoy someone being eviserated. It was well written and well researched.
Note to charity workers: DON'T TAKE PRIVATE JETS--it's tacky and exudes hubris, not charity.
very calmly and factually exposes the deceit. sad and disillusioning to learn of the misuse of the monies and desires of so many to help a worthy cause.
Take time to understand what Krakauer is saying
The key point of the book is that the mission that Greg Mortenson set out to accomplish was very noble. Krakauer alludes to this several times; he does not disparage CAI but rather what Mortenson has become as the result of the passing of time. The book is very constructive in pointing out the pathology of Mortenson in that organization while praising the core motivations that he originally brought to CAI: to bring education to those who (1) would not otherwise receive it or (2) would otherwise receive it from those intent on indoctrinating them into a fundamentalist sect.
Krakauer alludes to the key point of this book in the subtitle: "How Greg Mortenson, Humanitarian Hero, Lost His Way" -- he puts on the cover of the book that Mortenson once had a very good vision -- and reinforced in the final sentence: "With one hand Greg has created something beautiful and caring (regardless of his motives). With the other he has murdered his creation by his duplicity."
If this book can increase the effectiveness of CAI by removing Mortenson from the operational decision-making process without destroying CAI, than it will be a truly good thing.
Krakauer alludes to the key point of this book in the subtitle: "How Greg Mortenson, Humanitarian Hero, Lost His Way" -- he puts on the cover of the book that Mortenson once had a very good vision -- and reinforced in the final sentence: "With one hand Greg has created something beautiful and caring (regardless of his motives). With the other he has murdered his creation by his duplicity."
If this book can increase the effectiveness of CAI by removing Mortenson from the operational decision-making process without destroying CAI, than it will be a truly good thing.
I have to say I was torn in picking this book up. I read Greg Mortenson's Three Cups of Tea several years ago and LOVED it. Recommended it to and bought it for everyone I know.
But my respect for Krakauer, and his consistent search for the truth in all situations won out here and I read his piece.
I have to say that what Krakauer says raises serious doubts in my mind as the veracity of Three Cups of Tea. His effort is well researched and documented and the lack of any response, much less evidence, from Greg Mortenson is extremely disheartening.
But my respect for Krakauer, and his consistent search for the truth in all situations won out here and I read his piece.
I have to say that what Krakauer says raises serious doubts in my mind as the veracity of Three Cups of Tea. His effort is well researched and documented and the lack of any response, much less evidence, from Greg Mortenson is extremely disheartening.
Things to be said about Krakauer: he's controversial, but he's also tells a good tale.
This book is an expansion on the 60 minutes exposé of Doug Mortenson and his Central Asia Institute (CAI). It alleges that Mortenson lied about his experiences to create a more compelling story to entice donors, then misspent funds donated to the CAI through personal expenditure and poor allocation for the building and funding of schools. The investigative journalism is will done, and is supported by financial records and first hand accounts. It paints a tragic story of how philanthropic endeavors, started with the best intentions, can become twisted by the poor management of the founders who had the vision to start them.
The main strength of this book is also its weakness. Krakauer himself was very invested in Greg Mortenson's story and the CAI. It makes for impassioned writing, but it leaves one feeling a bit queasy about the reliability of Krakauer as a story teller. These are complaints that have been brought against Krakauer's other works, including Into Thin Air and Under the Banner of Heaven. You can tell that Krakauer is deeply invested in getting at the truth, and the passion drives the writing.
Krakauer tells a compelling story, and he's careful to back it up with hard evidence. He freely admits to the personal stake he put into Mortenson's cause. Although he likely didn't intend it to be such, Three Cups of Deceit is as much about the sting of betrayal that Krakauer felt as it is about Mortenson's lies and bad behavior.
This book is an expansion on the 60 minutes exposé of Doug Mortenson and his Central Asia Institute (CAI). It alleges that Mortenson lied about his experiences to create a more compelling story to entice donors, then misspent funds donated to the CAI through personal expenditure and poor allocation for the building and funding of schools. The investigative journalism is will done, and is supported by financial records and first hand accounts. It paints a tragic story of how philanthropic endeavors, started with the best intentions, can become twisted by the poor management of the founders who had the vision to start them.
The main strength of this book is also its weakness. Krakauer himself was very invested in Greg Mortenson's story and the CAI. It makes for impassioned writing, but it leaves one feeling a bit queasy about the reliability of Krakauer as a story teller. These are complaints that have been brought against Krakauer's other works, including Into Thin Air and Under the Banner of Heaven. You can tell that Krakauer is deeply invested in getting at the truth, and the passion drives the writing.
Krakauer tells a compelling story, and he's careful to back it up with hard evidence. He freely admits to the personal stake he put into Mortenson's cause. Although he likely didn't intend it to be such, Three Cups of Deceit is as much about the sting of betrayal that Krakauer felt as it is about Mortenson's lies and bad behavior.
This is a great book and it is vital everyone knows the true story. Im mad at Greg for cheating people around the world...especially the donors like Jon. It may be sad but it is the truth and we must accept it. I wish everyone could read this book. Not just kindle owners. This is a great book and everyone who has a kindle should take advantage of it.
Krakauer's Kindle single is investigative journalism at its finest. Such a sad story. So glad it was told so that no one else is duped by Mortenson's fictions.Three Cups of Deceit: How Greg Mortenson, Humanitarian Hero, Lost His Way (Kindle Single)
I remember when I first listened to Three Cups of Tea as an unabridged audiobook. Loved it. Couldn't believe a man could be capable of so much, but still I did.
Mr Krakauer's piece which I just finished reading completely kyboshed the relevance and sincerity of Mortenson's work. Three Cups of Deceit is written, not with an intention to hijack an innocent's good intentions, but rather to bring light to a con-man (a disorganized and eccentric one at that). I read it all in one sitting. I recommend it highly to anyone who's read Mortenson's sham work.
Mr Krakauer's piece which I just finished reading completely kyboshed the relevance and sincerity of Mortenson's work. Three Cups of Deceit is written, not with an intention to hijack an innocent's good intentions, but rather to bring light to a con-man (a disorganized and eccentric one at that). I read it all in one sitting. I recommend it highly to anyone who's read Mortenson's sham work.
I rad this "book" after hearing about and reading about it on the Internet. I am glad. Jon K investigated and wrote about it. People who read Three Cups of Tea ought to read this as well. Having traveled to the Balti region of Pakistan years ago, Mr. Mortenson's description had not matched my experience of that area as a "hotbead" of potential terrorism. In fact it is quite "open" and safe to travel in. It is where all the trekkers and mountaineer people go. But when I read it, I let it go. Not reading with enough critical eye. Just glad someone was writing that there ARE great people in that area of the world. Even if that were not so bad, its the lack of financial accountability that is really, really bad and is an ongoing lie. Why Mr. Mortensen needs a private plane to fly anywhere is beyond me. Imagine how many teachers he could have employed.. and said he employed.
A very quick read, well detailed/documented. Mortenson/CAI, like a lot of other charity organizations, don't do enough foot work after they get started to remain relavent and/or spend their donations in a wise manor.
Fantastic. One of the best reads you could imagine.
Shows in detail the depth of the fraud commited by Mortenson. Hopefully the IRS/CID will conduct a full and complete investigation. Cannot wait for Krakauer's next book. Maybe he will look further into the fraud CAI is and how little money actually was used to do charitable work.
this is a very well written expose, what a shame that mortenson tarnished his legacy by embellishing all of his deeds. Krakauer has the ability of writing a concise, easy to follow story line. A great read.
This is one of the gutsiest and most effective pieces of journalism I am read in some time. Extremely well-documented, very well-written (as usual) and really makes you think about what we do when we follow our "heros" without real scrutiny.
Lying and stealing is wrong. Lying and stealing from children is unforgiveable.
The fact that Greg Mortenson played on people's love for children is unforgivable! Money was given in good faith for the betterment of children! Hard earned money, and that of school children who saved their change to help other children in need. This is all revealed in Jon's book. I felt that Jon Krakauer covered this topic very thoroughly. He had been a financial supporter in what I would consider very large sums, as well as a "fan" of Greg's work. So in my opinion he is entitled to know where and how his money is being spent. I read Three Cups of Tea and like others who read it I was very moved by the stories presented as fact. Jon backed up his assessment of Greg Mortenson's work with facts. Facts that could be, and were, extensively researched. These facts bring Greg's lies out into the open and expose him as the fraud that he is. Jon even gave Mortenson the opportunity before the book went to print to refute the facts and he chose not to do so. That in itself speaks volumns as far as his integrity goes.
It is sad that so many Afghans were hurt by him as well. The very people he claimed to be helping. How sad that he could stoop so low for his own financial gain.
I'm glad that I read this little book, I have already passed it on to friends who read Three Cups of Tea and have recommended that they pass it along as well.
Greg should be prosecuted for his mishandling of other peoples money.
It is sad that so many Afghans were hurt by him as well. The very people he claimed to be helping. How sad that he could stoop so low for his own financial gain.
I'm glad that I read this little book, I have already passed it on to friends who read Three Cups of Tea and have recommended that they pass it along as well.
Greg should be prosecuted for his mishandling of other peoples money.
Three Cups of Deceit is Very Important
"Three Cups of Deceit" by Jon Krakauer is a very important document, and should be available to the public, not just to people who own Kindles. Nothing against Kindles--they are great! But by restricting Mr. Krakauer's essay to Kindle owners, a vast audience is not able to read "Three Cups of Deceit." I know the essay was free on Byliner for three days, but most people were in shock and did not know the essay would disappear, only to resurface at Amazon as a Kindle book.
We are getting many, many requests at our library for "Three Cups of Deceit." We tell our patrons they need a Kindle to read the essay. Once again, we love Kindles! But I propose that Jon Krakauer publish "Three Cups of Deceit" in print form and make it available to the public to buy on Amazon. That way our libraries can buy copies for our patrons. Or perhaps a magazine like the Atlantic Monthly could devote their entire issue to "Three Cups of Deceit." I only say this because Jon Krakauer's essay is very important.
As a librarian, I am dedicated to connecting people to information. Mr. Krakauer, I hope you are reading this, and know that thousands and thousands of people are not able to access "Three Cups of Deceit," which is a very, very important essay, and therefore, please consider putting your essay in print. Thank you. (And three cheers for the Kindle!)
We are getting many, many requests at our library for "Three Cups of Deceit." We tell our patrons they need a Kindle to read the essay. Once again, we love Kindles! But I propose that Jon Krakauer publish "Three Cups of Deceit" in print form and make it available to the public to buy on Amazon. That way our libraries can buy copies for our patrons. Or perhaps a magazine like the Atlantic Monthly could devote their entire issue to "Three Cups of Deceit." I only say this because Jon Krakauer's essay is very important.
As a librarian, I am dedicated to connecting people to information. Mr. Krakauer, I hope you are reading this, and know that thousands and thousands of people are not able to access "Three Cups of Deceit," which is a very, very important essay, and therefore, please consider putting your essay in print. Thank you. (And three cheers for the Kindle!)
Krakauer pens another compelling read about good intentions gone bad.
Mortenson has hoodwinked a lot of people into believing a fairy tale about his travels in Pakistan/Afghanistan. His story is so convincing that they willingly fork over their dollars to his charity. He then proceeds to live lavishly and travel widely on the donated funds, spending freely, and building a few schools along the way. Really not much different than Bernie Madoff. Hopefully he will be prosecuted and incarcerated for his misdeeds, and perhaps the unspent funds will be impounded and refunded to the donors.
Krakauer pulls back the curtain
Three cups of tea is one of those trendy reads that I always had the intention to getting around to reading, but never actually did. I actually feel better about that after reading an author that I trust illuminate the book for what it was: a passel of lies formulated to promote some guy's ego, plump his rating as a "bestselling author", and fund-raise for his organization. What's worse is profits from the book were never donated to the foundation it described! Krakauer explains how Mortenson lost his way, and while accomplishing some good, allowed hubris and personal flaws to taint a worthy organization and effort. Surprising that US brass in Afghanistan swallowed "3 Cups of Tea"; hook, line and copy of "Angling Times". Three cheers for Krakauer's reporting.
Impulse purchase well made, however depressing
Well, this saved me from shelling out the money to read Three Cups of Tea.
Stones Into Schools was required reading for a college English class I took not too long ago. That was my first - only, really - run in with Greg Mortenson. The book was okay. His accomplishments, as told in the book, impressive. This guy is building schools in the sticks of the sticks of Central Asia! He's super into educating girls! Cool.
Today I ran across this Kindle Single in a fit of boredom and decided, eh, why not? it's three bucks. And oh man, what a depressing read.
I make a point to read both the higher rated reviews and the one star reviews of the books I read or I'm thinking about reading. It certainly seems like Krakauer has an axe to grind - and who can blame him? - but at the same time, I don't understand the ends-justifies-the-means sort of argument some of these lower views are presenting. So what? Never mind embezzling ridiculous sums of money, he's still managed to produce so much good! I don't understand how that argument can fly. I don't understand how a so-called humanitarian hero can in good conscience carry on the way as presented in Krakauer's expose. I just don't get it. Stuff like this makes me lose hope in humanity.
Three Cups of Deceit was a brilliant piece of journalism. I highly recommend it - Krakauer is analytical and thorough and everything is well-presented. It probably will burst your bubble.
Stones Into Schools was required reading for a college English class I took not too long ago. That was my first - only, really - run in with Greg Mortenson. The book was okay. His accomplishments, as told in the book, impressive. This guy is building schools in the sticks of the sticks of Central Asia! He's super into educating girls! Cool.
Today I ran across this Kindle Single in a fit of boredom and decided, eh, why not? it's three bucks. And oh man, what a depressing read.
I make a point to read both the higher rated reviews and the one star reviews of the books I read or I'm thinking about reading. It certainly seems like Krakauer has an axe to grind - and who can blame him? - but at the same time, I don't understand the ends-justifies-the-means sort of argument some of these lower views are presenting. So what? Never mind embezzling ridiculous sums of money, he's still managed to produce so much good! I don't understand how that argument can fly. I don't understand how a so-called humanitarian hero can in good conscience carry on the way as presented in Krakauer's expose. I just don't get it. Stuff like this makes me lose hope in humanity.
Three Cups of Deceit was a brilliant piece of journalism. I highly recommend it - Krakauer is analytical and thorough and everything is well-presented. It probably will burst your bubble.
I am so done with Greg Mortenson
I am also sad and disappointed in Greg Mortenson...as he was a hero to me. I once was a believer that the book was life changing... I guess I was wrong. His management of the CAI was wrong and he needs to admit it!! Using the funds to better his book sales....where did you go wrong!!!!
I once was interested in donating to the cause and am really glad I never did.
Disappointed and never to read about his organization again....I rest my case. You are in the same catagory as James Frey. Only difference is.....he admitted it.
We are so over you...Greg Mortenson!!!
I once was interested in donating to the cause and am really glad I never did.
Disappointed and never to read about his organization again....I rest my case. You are in the same catagory as James Frey. Only difference is.....he admitted it.
We are so over you...Greg Mortenson!!!
This article was well researched, well written and convincing. I'm horrified by how entangled the non-profit organization became with Mortenson. And while it's all well and good to want to provide education to a populace that really needs it, seems like that is not what is really happening. Ghost schools are a different kind of horror story than I usually read but all the more horrific for being true.
I was about two-thirds through "Turning Stones into Schools" when the 60 Minutes documentary was released, so it of course peaked my interest. I had also recently read "Three Cups" and had also seen Greg speak nearby last summer when he was presented with a humanitarian award from a local university.
Since this expose has been released, I can't seem to get enough information around the accuracy of the tales Greg tells in his two books and speaking engagements. I hate to admit to a unflattering case of schadenfreude, but everything I read just makes me more and more sad about the recent misfortunes he is suffering. To me, the biggest indictments are around the lack of Greg's involvement with his "co-editors" (one might more accurately call them "ghost writers," ironically writing about "ghost schools"). These editors were no different from ourselves, all too willing to accept a story that dared to give us hope in that war-torn region amid nothing but poverty, strife and despair. Paired with a source who had little time to give them information and was likely vague in his notes, along with a demanding publisher, this all conspired to give them the artistic license to fill in the gaps, creating a fable that even Greg has now convinced himself is true since he has repeated it so many times in public.
I truly believe Greg has sincere intentions of doing good in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but over time, got in way over his head, a victim of his poor management skills and an oversized heart (which unfortunately is now in need of surgical repair). I do wish him well and hope the work that he has started will continue, but as others have stated, with better management in place and a more appropriate role for Greg as their visionary and spiritual leader, but not as an executive.
Since this expose has been released, I can't seem to get enough information around the accuracy of the tales Greg tells in his two books and speaking engagements. I hate to admit to a unflattering case of schadenfreude, but everything I read just makes me more and more sad about the recent misfortunes he is suffering. To me, the biggest indictments are around the lack of Greg's involvement with his "co-editors" (one might more accurately call them "ghost writers," ironically writing about "ghost schools"). These editors were no different from ourselves, all too willing to accept a story that dared to give us hope in that war-torn region amid nothing but poverty, strife and despair. Paired with a source who had little time to give them information and was likely vague in his notes, along with a demanding publisher, this all conspired to give them the artistic license to fill in the gaps, creating a fable that even Greg has now convinced himself is true since he has repeated it so many times in public.
I truly believe Greg has sincere intentions of doing good in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but over time, got in way over his head, a victim of his poor management skills and an oversized heart (which unfortunately is now in need of surgical repair). I do wish him well and hope the work that he has started will continue, but as others have stated, with better management in place and a more appropriate role for Greg as their visionary and spiritual leader, but not as an executive.
I lost all respect for Mortensen after reading Three Cups of Deceit, the Kindle single by one of my favorite authors, Jon Krakauer. There's no excuse for lying and I commend Krakauer for getting to the bottom of this.
Fishy start from kindle sample
I really wanted to read THREE CUPS OF TEA but did not buy the book after reading the kindle sample. I know fiction from non-fiction and Greg Mortenson's book was fishy from the start. I guess we Americans are suckers for "good feel" tales.
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
Create your own review
According to dozens of people who spoke to Krakauer, most of whom are quoted by name, Mortenson lied about the origins of his school-building project, lied about the number of schools he's built, lied about how much time he spends in Afghanistan, lied about his financial relationship with his charity, lied about how much he pays himself, lied about his "kidnapping" in 1996, and even lied about the fact that schools are mainly in relatively peaceful parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. There are probably a few other lies I've forgotten. For his own ego and financial gain, Mortenson took advantage of the goodwill of donors in America and all over the world.
As Krakauer points out, we are so desperate for good news out of Afghanistan that we latched onto Mortenson's story despite some of its obvious flaws (the Taliban didn't really exist in Pakistan in 1996, for example). Mortenson's efforts to defend himself at this point are pathetic, and if he is smart - and wants to avoid a criminal indictment - he will come clean and then slink away, never to be seen or heard again. And hopefully, the rest of us will be a little wiser the next time a Pied Piper comes along promising to solve the world's ills -- for just a few bucks down!
Lost in Kandahar (Kindle Single)