| List Price: | |
| Price: | $9.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details... |
| You Save: | $0.00(0.00%) |
| Binding: | Kindle Edition |
| EAN: | |
| Feature: | |
| Label: | Back Bay Books |
| Publisher: | Back Bay Books |
| Studio: | Back Bay Books |
| Tags: |
Editorial Reviews
Related Reviews
If you loved the show, you'll love the book
Face it: It's as "inside" SNL as you or I will ever get
Not all comments are complimentary, and not all that went on behind the scenes was funny. But it all makes for a fascinating read, despite the fact that a few notable surviving cast members chose not to participate in these oral interviews. "Live From New York" is as much a evolutionary history of the business of television over the past three decades as it is an oral history of the show itself. Perhaps SNL isn't as consistently cutting edge and counter-culture as it was in its earliest years. But nowadays the show IS the pop and showbiz culture it lampooned in the past. It cannot ever really return to its fabled glory days of 1975-1979 because the entire showbusiness landscape has changed so dramatically since then. One must credit Michaels for recognizing that and still plodding ahead with the show for most of the years since the days of The Not Ready For Prime Time Players.
Read this book to find the origins of many of the standard conventions and favorite moments of the show: why the band always dresses in tuxedos, the inspiration of Danny Aykroyd's buttcrack-exposing refrigerator repairman, the inhuman writing schedule, etc.
This is better than an "E! True Hollywood Story" any day.
Delicious Dish from the People Who Lived It.
This isn't the authors' take on SNL, but the history of Saturday Night Live from people who lived through it.
Tom Shales and James Miller in a smart, smart move chose to have everyone speak for themselves. And how telling it is. : ) The editors keep introductions and explanations to a minimum.
I was surprised about how candid many of the SNL stars and hosts were about themselves and the show.
If you have ever watched Saturday Night Live, you'll enjoy this book. With its insider stories,
you'll find this book hard to tear yourself out of. It's apparent that many stories of SNL players' behavior outside of 30 Rockefeller Center are not in this book, but what's there is more than enough.
So get your hands on this book-- you'll find it definitely lives up to the hype.
There are too many episodes of outlandish behavior to describe here, but suffice it to say there are things that went on that should have killed most shows. There's lots of gossip, of course, and many of the cast members embarrass themselves while trashing others and many that are a heck of a lot sweeter than you would think (Jane Curtin comes to mind). There is blatant talk of alleged 'racism', 'anti-feminism' (one member refused to do skits written by women) and outrageous drug use during, before and after the shows. In fact, in the beginning, it seems the show needed that edge to survive, or to survive, needed that edge.
No matter. This voluminous collection of after-thoughts is entertaining, hilarious and sometimes sad. You can decide where the true talent was, who had the biggest heart or who was the biggest jerk. This book is full of them and I highly recommend it.
Almost always live...and often lively
The material provides (albeit subjective) answers to questions such as these:
1. Which hosts were the most enjoyable to work with? Why?
2. Which were the most unpleasant? Why?
3. What was a normal week's work schedule? Who was involved in each stage of preparation for the next show?
4. Off-camera, what was it like to associate with John Belushi?
5. Of all the cast performers, why was Gilda Radner most loved?
6. How did Michaels deal with the NBC "suits" and especially with censors?
7. What were the biggest foul-ups prior to or during a show?
8. What do most of the cast and crew members agree are the show's greatest moments? Why?
9. What has been the best and worst aspects of being involved with SNL?
10. What is the consensus of opinion as to why SNL has continued for almost 30 years?
Of special interest to me are the professional as well as personal relationships between and among cast and crew members, including Michaels. More specifically, as I read this book, I was curious to know what impact those relationships had on the programs telecast each Saturday night. Radner, Belushi, and Phil Hartman were three of my personal favorites. Although they made no direct contributions to the reminiscences and observations assembled in this volume, all three are quoted extensively and recalled fondly by those who were closely associated with them.
Eddie Murphy offers a representative example of young people with immense but unrefined talent who are finally given the opportunity to perform. (During the 1980-81 season, one show ran short and needed several minutes of "filler" which he eagerly provided.) Almost immediately Murphy became the most popular member of the SNL cast and was featured prominently until 1984 when he began to concentrate on feature films. For reasons best revealed in this book, Murphy is probably the only SNL "star" who has since totally disassociated himself from the program.
Who will most enjoy reading this book? Those who have been regular viewers of SNL throughout much if not all of its remarkable history. I also highly recommend it to those who are especially interested in popular culture in the United States from 1975 until the end of the 20th century. I can think of no other television program which offers more and better insights into the culture of that period than does SNL. To their substantial credit, Tom Shales and James Andrew Miller allow the contributors to speak for themselves. Predictably and understandably, the value of what they have to say is determined almost entirely by each reader's degree of interest in those who have proclaimed, week after week, "Live from New York! It's Saturday Night!"
Often More Entertaining Than the Show Itself
There are exceptions: talented people from the show who wouldn't have anything to do with the book, like Eddie Murphy (clearly the show's greatest cast member ever), Dennis Miller, Jim Breuer, or the immortal Denny Dillon. But otherwise, you'll find a great story on virtually every page. There's enough here to keep you occupied for a good long time: Chevy Chase living up to his reputation as a complete scumbag, a staff writer's "encounter" with Milton Berle, Chris Farley doing something very naughty out the window of 30 Rock, Joe Piscopo taking his Sinatra impression a little too far. It's all presented here in the rawest form possible, with attitudes about the show ranging from reverential (Chris Rock) to contemptuous (Jane Curtin, Janeane Garofalo). Stories seemingly repeat themselves with new casts, or they contradict other stories from different people. It's all wildly entertaining. Having the voice of Lorne Michaels as a consistent presence throughout the book helps keep it all cohesive, with his own love-hate relationships rightly taking over as the dominant theme. You'll have an opinion of your own on Michaels once you've finished.
There are some flaws here. The tone from the authors (one of whom, Shales, is a TV critic) is too reverential. Okay, SNL changed TV. We get it already. We quickly learn that fact is almost more atrributable to the show's indestructible format than a product of the show's humor. SNL, after all, is usually only sporadically funny. What the authors and subjects illustrate well is that when the show has moments that ARE funny, they become immortal in the world of comedy. And that is absolutely incredible. There is no other show like SNL, for better or for worse, this book says. It's right. No show lives off its own legend of both comedy and excess like SNL. If the show seems a little staid these days, it still has the ability to make you watch, if only in the hope that you'll see something that will become the stuff of legend. SNL is a show that lives off the hope of laughter, and every subject in Live from New York points that out either directly or indirectly. It's amazing to think that one show, with so many people involved, can have the same effect on everyone.
Now, if they could just stop putting Maya Rudolph in every sketch...
Until the rise of Comedy Central and hundreds of cable channels, it was the only place on TV for political satire, and one of the few places for live music.
"Live From New York: An Uncensored History of Saturday Night Live" is a chronicle of the show's history, told by (most of) the people involved. I expected the book to be narrative, but it isn't: authors Tom Shales (TV critic for the Washington Post) and James Andrew Miller structured almost the entire book as a series of interview snippets about particular people, episodes, or events.
The section on John Belushi's death, for instance, includes comments from more than a dozen people, including Belushi's family, friends and writers and cast members from the show.
The approach is interesting when it lets you see multiple sides of a conflict or different perspectives on a cast member, as with the extensive quotes from Norm Macdonald, Lorne Michaels, and Don Ohlmeyer, who forced Macdonald's firing midway through the 1999-2000 season.
It can be quite entertaining, as well, as we hear Joe Piscopo explain that his Sinatra impression was really a tribute, then hear from the writers who couldn't believe all the things Piscopo resisted on the grounds that "Frank wouldn't do that," including "Frank wouldn't eat in the Carnegie Deli," "Frank wouldn't wait for Stevie Wonder, Stevie would have to wait for Frank," and "Frank wouldn't jump off a building." Finally, in frustration, the writers considered a sketch called "Frank wouldn't do that."
On the other hand, there are a lot of voices left out: Eddie Murphy apparently refused to participate, and of course former cast members John Belushi, Gilda Radner, Chris Farley and Phil Hartman and writer Michael O'Donoghue are now dead.
It's usually the job of the author to provide an objective and critical eye on their sources. Here, that's mostly missing. Depending on whose quote you believe, Lorne Michaels is either the devil, a raging egomaniac, an opportunist who took advantage of the tremendous talent on the show, a gifted comedy writer, a creative genius, or all of the above.
Still, you'll learn a lot about what happens in the manic week leading up to 11:30 Saturday nights here. What the heck does the host really do? How many sketches do they prepare in a given week?
And there's a lot of SNL trivia, as well. Who was the first to say the "f-word" on SNL (I was surprised to learn it wasn't Charles Rocket)? Who was the first (maybe still the only) musical guest to lip-synch on the show?
"Live From New York" also provides some interesting perspective on the show's history: When did the show shift to being a platform for recurring characters? What led to the "star turn" season with already established performers like Billy Crystal, Martin Short, and Harry Shearer?
Still, if you're looking for a history particularly of the show's first decade, I would instead recommend "Saturday Night: A Backstage History of 'Saturday Night Live' ", by Doug Hill and Jeff Weingrad. Published in 1986, it's now out of print, but it's a very entertaining read that tells the story as, well, a story.
If, on the other hand, you're curious about how the performers, writers, guests and executives behind the show look at it, "Live From New York" is the place to start.
I noticed that there's also a book out now by William G. Clotworthy called "Saturday Night Live: Equal Opportunity Offender". I recognized his name -- he was the NBC censor assigned to the show in its earlier years, and the book is his chronicle of the standards and practices battles with the show.
Whether you still love the show, hate it, or are ambivalent, this book is for you. I found it particularly nice that everyone involved, particularly the comedians, take it seriously here. No one is "on", no one tries to be funny, everyone just opens their hearts and reveal what they truly feel. I have a (new) huge amount of respect now for Bill Murray who I never thought could take ANYthing seriously - here he is incredibly serious, fortright, and reflective. His thoughts impressed me the most.
All the highs and lows are covered. Reflections on lost cast members are respectful and touching.
This is a great book.
Material in search of better writers
When you have a book consisting largely of interview snippets, what you have is a cross-section of opinions. Some of those opinions may have a greater amount of concensus behind them than others. Better writers could have done real research to qualify or confirm the statements made by the interview subjects: was Doumanian's budget actually cut from the first years of the show? If so, by as much as she claims? Where did the cuts hit the most? What were the actual box office numbers of Belushi's and Murphy's movies? Have they taken later rentals and tv showings into account in saying who was more successful? Was Nora Dunn as unsuccessful after leaving the show as her resentful colleagues would like to think? (A quick look at imdb.com suggests not...)
Apart from the failure to provide factual context, the writers show their own prejudices in ways that can't help to be annoying and occasionally disturbing. The bridge and introduction segments are full of the usual kind of biography hyperbole better writers avoid. SNL "helped bestow upon the comedy elite the hip-mythic status that rock stars had long enjoyed." "An audience that expected to see fresh new Gildas, Belushis... refused to settle for the paltry replacements that initially dominated Doumanian's cast." "[Belushi's death] told his friends at Saturday Night Live not only that John was mortal, but that they were too." All arguable statements, of course, but statements better writers would have let the material say for them without lapsing into purple, melodramatic prose.
Further, there's a distracting sense that the writers have their own over-protective issues with the show. "Those who hurt show bad! Those who protect show, good!" I can't help but wonder if Jean Doumanian and Nora Dunn suffer largely from an absence of voices other than their own to present their point of view. And while Dunn might have handled walking off the infamous Andrew Dice Clay show better than she did, the authors describing Clay's act as "politically incorrect" and "antifeminist" rather than mysoginist- which it very arguably was- is telling.
The authors arrangement seems to have been written as if imagining a television show- perhaps understandable, given the choice of topic, but a poor choice for a book. When snippets of interview are presented in an arbitrary order without any knowledge of the questions that provoked those answers, one cannot help but wonder if the authors were more interested in selling a particular version than giving their readers a chance to draw their own conclusions. Again, do the authors really contribute to the material? Does this arrangement offer so much more than we could have gotten if they had just presented the whole interviews, with questions, one per chapter?
Finally, there are obvious gaps in who is and is not interviewed, and how much material they are given. Again, A.D. Clay's receiving a page and a half in his own defense is telling, though I'm sure the reader recognizes by now that the topic grated on my nerves. But more, two of the show's most notable stars- Dennis Miller and Eddie Murphy- are not interviewed at all. It is mentioned in passing that Murphy dislikes talking about the show; no mention is made of the reason for Miller's absence. A better book would acknowledge the absence and their attempts to work around it. And while I enjoyed reading Tom Hanks's segments, his contributions to a chapter devoted to a period in the show's history where not only had he yet to host, but yet to become a professional actor, are extremely questionable.
For all this, I enjoyed reading much of the book. Some of the interview material is insightful; some of the anecdotes are side-splittingly funny. I just can't help but wish the authors, Pulitzer-winners though they may be, didn't seem to be such hacks. Two stars for the writers, four for the material, average of three.
Saturday Night Live as you have never seen it
Mr. Miller and Mr. Shales do a fantastic job of re-creating the history of this weekend institution. The stories and anecdotes come straight from the cast members, producers, writers, and everyone else involved with the show. The book goes in chronological order and begins as Lorne Michaels is on his quest to put together this show.
In reading this book, you will get the inside scoop on every major SNL event from its inception until now. Among the highlights, we get the dish on: the Bill Murray, Chevy Chase fight, the deaths of Jim Belushi, Chris Farley, and Phil Hartman. The romances, the drugs, the parties, the mistakes, the successes, the most loved hosts (Christopher Walken), the most hated hosts (Chevy Chase, Robert Blake), the rivalries between the writers, the competition to get sketches on the air and the rotating door of cast members.
This book is great light reading, and would be a great gift for that SNL fan in your family.
Great Read, No Matter Who You Believe
Still, this book is fully deserving of the perhaps too-often-ascribed label "page turner." You'll be able to put it down, of course, but you won't want to. You'll want to keep going, even if your head is swimming with factoids, innuendo, inside information, and some of the best tossed-off stories of famous people behaving badly. All the "dirt" aside, though, it's the more positive stuff I really relish about this book--the good stuff about Gilda, John, and the rest. There are some nice tributes here, and they really shine.
Of course, if you're a huge fan of Chevy Chase, you might avoid this book, because, as others have said, he gets torn apart pretty well here. To his credit, he admits that he's been a jerk in the past, but still, from year one to now, he's been reviled by most of the cast. For me, I'm still a fan of his work, but I don't think I want to be in a cast meeting with him. With all the stories, positive and negative, it comes down to who you're going to believe. For the most part, the editors let you decide, and haven't seemed to make a decision for you. And in the end, as I said, it won't matter. It's still a good, solid read.
First Hand Gossip Account of SNL
It is not surprising how many of the people interviewed for the book, including all of the major creative and artistic SNL participants, claim credit for much of the show's success, while pawning off failures and disasters on others. The book is strongly focused on the early years, concentrating on Lorne Michaels and the original seven cast members, then moves more quickly through the 1980s and 1990s. The authors provide little of their own commentary, preferring to let those interviewed tell the story from their perspective.
An Honestly Subjective History
A total page-turner, especially for SNL fans
I also don't like the implication of the subtitle of the book that this in an uncensored history. It seems like all of the "uncensored" topics aren't delved into, but merely skirted around. Apparently there was a problem between Dana Carvey and Mike Meyers with Wayne's World. What was the problem exactly, well I don't know for sure, I can only assume, which to me is a censored recollection of the events. It's not my job as a reader to fill in the blanks.
This book feels like a compendium of, or the companion piece to a book that doesn't exist, a book that would basically be the history or biography of SNL. Though it's an interesting concept, and I'm sure it averted the headache of libel or misquotation, having the entire text be snippets from interviews with the participants ends up very disjointed and makes it very hard on the reader to keep up with the timeline of events. It also created a lot of repetition as different cast members say the exact same thing on the same topic. Yes, apparently there were a lot of all night writing sessions. Yes, apparently there was a lot of pressure to get your work on the show. I think a lot of this has to do with the authors' hands off approach, their unwillingness to put their perspective on the material, that in the end makes this book a very dull read.
The other thing that bugged me was that a lot of the cast members seemed to be left out of the history as far as how they joined and where they came from. Sure I understand that some probably either didn't want to be involved or couldn't be reached, but it's up to the authors to fill in these blanks, which they don't. Even if the '81 cast is considered bad and unsuccessful that doesn't mean that they shouldn't be represented.
Great Read; Someone wake up the Editor, though...
A little criticism: The pictures were great; a few more (esp. of the writers) would have been even better.
A medium criticism: No treatment of the infamous "Fire Don Pardo On The Air" scheme that didn't quite happen.
A larger criticism: The "bumper" paragraphs by the authors are horrible. Little information, lots of unsupported editorializing. The books stands much better alone than with these entries.
A big-time criticism: Did the editor take a nap when it was time to chop away at the last 150 pages? Holy moly that content could easily have been halved without losing any substance at all, especially the last chapter.
I just watched a re-run of SNL; it was even more fun after reading this book.
The stories are told primarily by those involved, in their own words, verbatim, including cast members, writers, hosts and producers. Some surprising tidbits include an almost universal dislike of Chevy Chase, Nora Dunn's harsh treatment of co-stars, and Eddie Murphy's grudge against the show (he is the only cast member who would not appear on the 25th anniversary special and is not interviewed in the book).
The book reads like an interview. There is almost no narrative from the authors. It's like reading a filmed documentary where the camera switches back and forth between the interviewees. This format fails only rarely, and the comments are usually placed somewhat in chronological order, and occasionally are lined up together, highlighting common viewpoints between participants where they exist.
Most of the memorable, gossipy events are covered, such as Nora Dunn's exile from the show when Andrew Dice Clay appeared, Jean Doumanian's brief stint as producer that almost got the show cancelled, Norm Macdonald's ousting as Update anchor, Sinead's unanticipated Pope-bashing, etc., etc., etc.
A fascinating read that will make you look at the show in a different light once you finish it. May also make you feel a bit misty-eyed, as you link SNL memories with memories of where you were and who you were as you witnessed them live.
Rambling, Tedious, and Pretentious
Weak points: This book needed a lot of editing. It's as if raw tapes were transcribed; the comments and views could have been tightened up substantially without losing any of the flavor. Every once in a while, the authors (Shales and Miller) provide a bit of commentary, but it's not enough...kind of like a Christmas fruit cake with too many jellied fruits and not enough dough.
Another weak point--probably not Shales' and Miller's fault, but due to the way the book was created--is that you're given the sense that what appeared on the air was generally "the best of the best"...that the process of winnowing down all the material left most of the gems on-air (as well as many that regrettably didn't make it). I was mostly a fan of the earlier years but, after reading the book, I watched many of the shows on satellite (Comedy Channel). A lot of the shows and a lot of the bits were pretty weak. My point: There's a real disconnect between what many of the writers and performers recall and what the tape actually reveals.
Finally, an in depth comprehensive look at the real SNL
Some people are shattered by the harsh accounts given in this book. For real SNL fans, there is nothing too new here. What is nicely done is that the telling of these backstage stories are quite complete and nicely pieced together. For example, if there's an story about a specific cast member...you will read from several people (fellow castmembers, the person itself, agents, producers, etc.) on the issue. This clears up a lot of the gossip and explains in-depth the "truth" (or at least a more objective compilation) of how some of these historical occurances came to be.
SNL is a fascinating institution. You will quickly understand the impact this show has made on pop-culture, comedy, politics, and many things we take for granted today. More importantly, you will understand what it was like at the time as it was happening to these people who all thought they were going to the be the cast that ended the show that of course still goes on years after them. SNL has transformed from the rebel of television to the standard of what sketch comedy and late night entertainment has become. It refreshed the variety show days and brought players from the Second City and other such troupes to the mainstream audience.
This book is probably the best account you will ever get of what its like to work in this sort of high paced enviroment. It is always intersting to see the collaboration, frustration, and artistic struggle of all the writers, performers, guest hosts, producers, and even agents that are all representing in this thick compilation.
This book does also include many personal stories that reveal more of the human side to this fraternity of SNL alum...and beyond the protected PR world. Petty cast squabbles, working for a man like Lorne, and sadly the loss of Belushi, Gilda, Hartman, Farley, and others.
Its an easy read, easy to pick up and flip around in any order. You will likely find yourself reading this book for hours at a time (yes, it is a thick chunk of pages!) and soon Cross-referencing people and stories (in a VERY detailed and useful index!) Take all the fluff stuff you saw on E!'s true Hollywood Stories and People....and look up the real deal here in this book. There will be "his side and her side" and therefore somewhere the truth.
If you like SNL, get the 20th anniversary book...if you love SNL, this book will test that love. You will either feel at home, run screaming, or just have mixed emotions for us entertainment business types.
A Classic Work On A Classic Show
The book works with this approach and probably couldn't have been penned in any other way. The candidness and pointed opinions of the people involved needed to be heard in their own words.
There is a wealth of "insider" information on how ideas were developed, the feuds off the stage that ignited the work before the audience and why grudges from years past have never been settled.
What is particularly interesting is how the program evolved over the first five years, since that foundation is how SNL has been measured since.
After being written off numerous times, the TV icon that is SNL continues to forge ahead, which is how the book concludes. A fan of SNL or a person wanting to explore a continuing piece of American pop culture can't get any closer to the program.
It is a great read, soooooo much information you would never have known otherwise. I really thought this would be one of those books that would last me a while and I looked forward to that, but because you know so many of the cast and are so interested in the words from their own mouth, you really cant put it down. Dont pass this one by!!
Pretty addictive if not quite complete
I remember watching the first SNL when I was in junior high and have been a fan ever since (I have two favorite casts: the original Players and then the Phil Hartman/Jan Hooks/Jon Lovitz/Dana Carvey period).
The book is 565 pages long, but I kept wishing for more insights into a lot of the classic characters and sketches. A good place to find that kind of detail is in another book that came out in the late 1980's called SATURDAY NIGHT: A BACKSTAGE HISTORY OF "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE" by Doug Hill & Jeff Weingrad (definitely worth reading for the early history of the show).
But the behind-the-scenes dramas and brawls here are irresistible. I thought Bill Murray's comments had a depth and thoughtfulness while I still wonder how Chevy Chase can keep going back to host with his boorish and obnoxious behavior (when recently interviewed by Fox News about his rude past documented in this and other books, Chevy said probably the most suspicious thing any celebrity could say: "I don't read them...they're all lies." Huh?).
I really appreciated reading about how the deaths of John Belushi, Gilda Radner, Phil Hartman and Chris Farley affected the other performer/writers.
Definitely worth checking out.
I won't say anything cliche here
When in fact, the book hasn't painted him out to be a jerk at all. There were people that resented him, but it was sheerly out of their own, personal pettiness.
They resented him because he got famous first. That reflects poorly on those that resented him, not on Chevy Chase.
What I also found interesting was that none of what I've read has mentioned how mean John Belushi could be. Maybe people won't mention this because he's dead...but it doesn't keep it from being evident.
At least Belushi had a rather redeeming quality about him. Belushi was on most occasions sweet and lovable.
It's Harry Shearer that really seems to be the biggest jerk with the biggest chip on his shoulder to match with his huge ego. He, unfortunately for the people that worked with him, doesn't have any redeeming qualities.
The book has been a great insight to what actually went on in Rockefeller Plaza. Some people's stories contradict...but you can gather what's the truth when you read all sides of each story.
The only reason I'm not giving the book a 5 star rating is because it's sometimes written chronologically out of order. Which makes it a little confusing, not to mention odd.
But alas, if you've ever gotten into at least one season of SNL you'll enjoy this book.
Multiple perspectives is a huge strength of this book
I highly recommend this book to anyone who's a fan of SNL or its writers or stars. Seinfeld fans will want to check out the stories about Larry David's season as a writer on the show.
A superb overview of an American tradition
Shales and Miller have interviewed practically everyone who ever had anything to do with the show, from creator Lorne Michaels to the stars to the guest hosts, writers and musical guests. We see the hatching of particularly well-known skits like the Czech "wild and crazy" brothers played by Steve Martin and Dan Aykroyd, Gilda Radner and Bill Murray's loopy "nerds" couple, Belushi's Marlon Brando impression, right on up through Eddie Murphy's linguistically-challenged Buckwheat, Joe Piscopo's self-satisfied Frank Sinatra, Molly Shannon's nervy Mary Katherine Gallagher, and Julia Sweeney's beloved hermaphroditic "Pat."
They're all here and then some, and while that's a lot of fun, what is almost better are the behind-the-scenes goings-on. The account of the writers dying with laughter while they write Buckwheat's rendition of Lionel Richie's "Three Times a Lady" is alone going to make most readers happy ("Unz, tice, fee times a nady" went the immortal lyrics). Writer and performer Al Franken's account of his daughter's baby shower (where he showed up with a doll, proceeded to smash the doll on the coffee table, and scared to death every guest who thought the doll was, in fact, the sleeping baby) is priceless.
There are sadnesses, too, harkening back to the old adage about people in pain producing the best comedy. We see in-depth the problems of John Belushi and Chris Farley, and get chills reading about the untimely demise (at his wife's hand) of the brilliant Phil Hartman. We squirm at the unhappy tenures of both Harry Shearer and Janeane Garofalo, both of whom were a bad fit with SNL's culture (Garofalo seems still puzzled and unhappy with her experience, while Shearer has a light touch--when relating that he left for "creative differences," he says, "Yeah, I was creative and they were different").
The only problem with the book--and it is rather a big one--is that Eddie Murphy refused to be interviewed for its pages. That this colossal talent's voice is missing from the book means we get only everyone else's perspective on him. It's instructive, but it would have made the book utterly complete had we had Murphy's own recollections of his 1980s stint on the show. Still, this is a wonderfully written (and judiciously edited) book.
A must for the cultural observer
An interesting overview of SNL's backstage history
The story spans 28 years of the show's history, and does so in great detail. However, Doug Hill and Jeff Weingrad's "Saturday Night: A Backstage History of Saturday Night Live" does a better job of chronicling the earliest days of the show.
NEVERTHELESS... with "Live From New York," Tom Shales & J.A. Miller have carved up a fun, fascinating read. You can open the pages to any point and find some interesting bit of gossip or history. When it hits trade paperback it will be a required addition to any pop culture fan's bathroom bookshelf.
My main quibble with the authors is that the talented production design staff who created so much of the "look" of "Saturday Night Live," such as veteran Akira Yoshimura, were not interviewed. Why not? Are the authors planning a second book on this subject? Perhaps they should consider it.
Even though I was often reading about characters I'd never actually seen for myself, or about cast members I'd never heard of, I still found the stories really intriguing. There could perhaps have been a bit more from recent and current cast members, but I suspect some of them were reluctant to talk too much about the insider goings on. Plus, there is maybe less controversy and dirt in the relatively sanitized current show.
Contrary to what other reviewers have said, this show isn't a homage to Lorne Michales - plenty of people take digs at him, some better concealed than others. Also, it isn't all sweetness and light on the show, there is clearly a lot of tension within the show and some real knives in the back.
Overall, I loved the fact that I started to see the people behind the characters, and I got a real feel for the highs and lows the cast and sho have gone through over the years.
I loved reading this book and regularly dip into various chapters. On the negative side, I wish it could have been divided up in a more readable format with more sections, and some more photos would have been great. They probably didn't do this because a photograph-laden book already exists, which I also really recommend.
I really enjoyed this book, it's a must for SNL fans.
Addictive reading - A very fast 565 pages
Particularly when detailing the show's creation through its first five years, the reader really gets a true sense of what the day to day process was of working on the show - from the immense amounts of cocaine used by all but a few to get through the all-night writing sessions, to the pre-AIDS era bed-hopping that was done between cast and crew members. The book provides more detail on some well known stories (most people know that John Belushi had a drug problem, but until reading this book I didn't understand the true depths of his addiction) as well as providing many surprises (I would have never pegged Harry Shearer as someone who was so universally despised during his time on the show nor did I realize how catty Nora Dunn and Jan Hooks were towards Victoria Jackson).
One of the fun aspects of reading "Live From New York" is hearing differing perspectives on the same story. For example, first you'll hear Janeane Garofalo discuss what a horrible working environment "SNL" was during her brief time on the show, followed by one of the show's writers explaining that Garofalo was something of an insecure nutjob who created her own bad experience. Likewise, you'll hear former producer Jean Doumanian described as "Ayatollah Doumanian" by those who worked for her during her tenure as executive producer, followed by Doumanian herself describe how she was set up to fail. Some people might get frustrated by the lack of an objective "truth" presented in some of these stories, but this seemed to me to be more true to real life, where often the "reality" of a situation is dependent on your own perspective. Also very interesting was reading about the perceived weaknesses in the current "SNL" program in the opinion of some of the writers, including an overreliance on sketches involving recurring characters, too many "surprise" appearances by celebrities who are being parodied (as in the real Robert DeNiro "surprising" a cast member who is doing a parody of Robert DeNiro), and a lack of political bite that once defined the show.
If I have anything negative to say about the book, it is only that the early sections, regarding the first few years of the show, spoil the reader in terms of the immense detail presented there that is missing in the sections dealing with the program's later years. In discussing the first few years of the show, the authors give great detail on how virtually every cast member came to be hired, what their history was before the show, how they got along with fellow cast and crew members, and whether or not the indulged in many of the bad habits that went on during the show. As the book gets to more recent casts, often the book would just mention that so and so and so and so joined the show, without much detail of how that came to be, instead choosing to focus on major controversies in the shows recent history, such as Nora Dunn walking off the show in protest of Andrew Dice Clay being invited to guest host, Sinead O'Connor tearing up a picture of the Pope on air, the deaths of Phil Hartman and Chris Farley, and NBC West Coast President Don Ohlmeyer's single-minded obsession with getting Norm McDonald fired from his "Weekend Update duties. If not for a sentence or two, you could go through the whole book without realizing that Dennis Miller was ever on the show. This is one of those rare books where, even at nearly 600 pages, the book seems too short. I would have gladly read several hundred more if it meant that all periods of the show were given the same depth.
4-1/2 stars -- Long but GREAT retrospective
This book, compiled by Tom Shales and James Andrew Miller, is a very good retrospective of the series, and how (and WHY) it came to be. I originally expected the book to just be straightforward and biographical, if you will, but the whole thing is actually told through the testimonies of workers on the show, cast members, NBC executives, writers, and even guest hosts.
There were a few surprises I found, though. One is that Chevy Chase appears to be a very arrogant person, because whenever he came back to host, to say that he insulted the cast would be an understatement (he was eventually banned from hosting ever again after 1996). As for Dick Ebersol, who replaced Lorne Michaels as executive producer from 1981 to 1985...well, a lot of people in the book say that his name seems to fit his personality. And it was also interesting that the book never mentioned anything about Martin Lawrence's risqué monologue when he hosted back in '94.
It was also revealed things like the TRUE reason why Ben Stiller pulled out of hosting the second episode of the 2001-02 season (it ended up being hosted by Seann William Scott, who was originally supposed to host the following episode), hosts from Hell like Steven Seagal (maybe that's why NBC doesn't air that episode any more) and Frank Zappa, and behind-the-scenes problems with the seemingly tight cast from 1986 to 1990 (Dana, Nora, Phil, Jan, Victoria, Jon, Dennis, and Kevin). Also, I was surprised to find testimonies from people like Nora Dunn and Norm MacDonald because I didn't think cast members that were fired would want to talk about the show at all. But I WASN'T surprised to see no sign of Eddie Murphy (what's up with his ego, anyway?).
Anyway, this is a very good book. At close to 600 pages, it'll take you a few days to get through it, but if you're really into Saturday Night Live, you should like it.
Anthony Rupert
P.S. One more thing I'd like to mention is that there are pictures in the middle of the book from various years, and one picture is taken from the 1998-99 season, and it shows a "Celebrity Jeopardy!" sketch with the caption stating that Michael J. Fox is portraying Tom Cruise. It was Ben Stiller, not Michael J. Fox.
A Quick Read, Even at 566 Pages...
A Good Read On The Inside Of SNL
Written as a long set of interjecting interview with various writers, producers, cast members, and hosts from over the years on SNL, this book lets a lot of people give there perspective on different incidets and episodes. These views are often contradictory based on who is telling the story, and in the early years, usually blured by use of drugs and alcolhol.
There are very interesting facts that forever have changed our thoughts about some of the people we have originally loved on the show. It was reported that, for instance, Chevy Chase was such a mean man that he had abused other cast members with insults and vainglory, and got into a fistfight with Bill Murray when he returned a year later as a guest host after leaving the show. It was also reported that Gilda Radner didn't do drugs, but rather she was a bulimic who purged and vomited off the set. Knowing that both examples were put into this book, whether one wants to believe they actually happened, makes this book very chilling. It is one of the most spectacular show biz books of all time.
Another very funny book I recommend is a goof on teaching and Hollywood entitled "No One's Even Bleeding".
Often More Entertaining Than the Show Itself
There are exceptions: talented people from the show who wouldn't have anything to do with the book, like Eddie Murphy (clearly the show's greatest cast member ever), Dennis Miller, Jim Breuer, or the immortal Denny Dillon. But otherwise, you'll find a great story on virtually every page. There's enough here to keep you occupied for a good long time: Chevy Chase living up to his reputation as a complete scumbag, a staff writer's "encounter" with Milton Berle, Chris Farley doing something very naughty out the window of 30 Rock, Joe Piscopo taking his Sinatra impression a little too far. It's all presented here in the rawest form possible, with attitudes about the show ranging from reverential (Chris Rock) to contemptuous (Jane Curtin, Janeane Garofalo). Stories seemingly repeat themselves with new casts, or they contradict other stories from different people. It's all wildly entertaining. Having the voice of Lorne Michaels as a consistent presence throughout the book helps keep it all cohesive, with his own love-hate relationships rightly taking over as the dominant theme. You'll have an opinion of your own on Michaels once you've finished.
There are some flaws here. The tone from the authors (one of whom, Shales, is a TV critic) is too reverential. Okay, SNL changed TV. We get it already. We quickly learn that fact is almost more attributable to the show's indestructible format than a product of the show's humor. SNL, after all, is usually only sporadically funny. What the authors and subjects illustrate well is that when the show has moments that ARE funny, they become immortal in the world of comedy. And that is absolutely incredible. There is no other show like SNL, for better or for worse, this book says. It's right. No show lives off its own legend of both comedy and excess like SNL. If the show seems a little staid these days, it still has the ability to make you watch, if only in the hope that you'll see something that will become the stuff of legend. SNL is a show that lives off the hope of laughter, and every subject in Live from New York points that out either directly or indirectly. It's amazing to think that one show, with so many people involved, can have the same effect on everyone.
Now, if they could just stop putting Maya Rudolph in every sketch...
I also love how cast members and writers all just aired their dirty laundry. All of the feuds and petty arguments came through! What can I say, I'm sycophantic for the original cast, and several of the later casts. If you are a fan of SNL, any cast, this book is for you!
Great quotes, great story, some narrative please
I really enjoyed "Live From New York." What a brilliant topic for a thorough book. I have sometimes loved Saturday Night Live and other times loathed it. SNL has given the world some great stars and some of forgettable ones.
In compiling this book, Shales and Miller did endless leg work and then stepped out of the picture. They wrote introductions for the various sections of the book but left the text to meander as the body of the book is really little more than a list of quotes from the people who were there.
Shales and Miller reached almost everybody of any stature in the history Saturday Night Live--writers, comedians, producers. (Eddie Murphy was notably abscent.)
My gripe is that Miller and Shales are fine writers with expert views, I wanted to hear more of what they thought. I wanted to hear a little of their voice, and I wanted them to help me pick up on some of the nuances.
I wanted to know whom they trusted and whom they dismissed. When Bill Murray and Chevy Chase got into a shoving match--was Murray reacting to Chase's arrogance or had John Belushi put Murray up to attack? What do Shales and Miller think after interviewing both men? You won't get it from this book?
That said, reading quote after quote by everybody who is still alive (Gilda Radner, Chris Farley, John Belushi, and many other key people have passed away) becomes somewhat hypnotic, and you really do hear their voices in their quotes.
Excellent History of Saturday Night Live
A large portion of the book is devoted to Lorne Michaels which is both a fascinating read and annoying in parts because I would have preferred even more focus on the Not-Ready-For-Primetime Players past and present.
A cast list is included for each year but a list of guest hosts, musical guests and sketches is not and would require an entirely different style of book (and would make a great book too!).
As a reference tool, occasional read and/or cover-to-cover can't put down book this is an excellent biography of what I consider to be one of the best television shows ever produced.
I really enjoyed hearing about the original cast and crew, how the show got started, the challenges faced by Lorne Michaels and the cast in simply getting skits on the air. And while I'm very familiar with the cast and crew from the first five seasons, I found some of the most interesting parts of the book dealing with the fumbling around of the 1980 season, and the Dick Ebersol era as well.
No punches are pulled, you get all of the highlights and all of the low-lights straight from the mouths of the crew, cast and creators. I liked that nothing was glided over, from the drug abuse by various cast members, to the pressure and horror of writing and producing a 90 minute live television show every week gets a thorough treatment.
I will say it took me awhile to get into the "interview" style of writing, I am used to a more "narrative" type of writing. I guess the biggest issue I had with this writing style and the format of the book is that it offered quite a bit of repetition. For instance when the 1980 season is looked at and we get offered a plethora of opinions about Jean Doumanian and her reign as producer, everyone chimes in on whether Jean was a good choice, was the season a total failure, who were the breakout stars, etc. And by the end of the section you realize you've just read 30 pages of people either saying "Jean wasn't a good choice" or "Jean did the best job she could've under those circumstances"....only repeated like 50 times by a variety of people. So, yes while it may be interesting to hear Gilbert Gottfried's opinion..when it's basically the EXACT same thing as said by Joe Piscopo and by Dick Ebersol and several other to boot, it kind of gets stale. And this happens over and over again throughout the book on every topic. Something along the lines of "Jean was in over her head, and most of the 1980 cast agreed." would've gotten the point across.....and saved the reader quite a bit of time.
The only other complaint I have regarding "Live From New York" is the final chapter on Lorne Michaels. Okay, I understand SNL is Michaels...and Michaels is SNL, but talk about repetition!! Why do we have to read from about 100 different people that Lorne is the "father figure" around SNL??! I think we could've gleaned that info from about 10 cast members just as well, instead, we read over and over again how when it comes to praise Lorne is kind of skimpy...but when he does praise your performance or your writing...it's really great. Ugh...that got old quick.
Still, as a fan of the show, I enjoyed this book. I like the behind the scenes info, and it really is amazing that SNL is still thriving...he'll it's been almost 10 years since this book was published!! If you are a die-hard fan of the series, you'll enjoy this book, and if you wonder just how in world SNL has survived almost 40 years this book is worth picking.
Create your own review



There is so much history in the years of SNL that there is an anecdote for every fan, but this book recognizes Loren Michaels as being the true genius behind the creation and development of the show. He's not universally loved by the cast (but also not nearly as despised as Chevy Chase, who seems to beeveryone's favorite whipping boy), but his genius is acknowledged by one and all.
A lot of favorite skits and characters are discussed, as well as some legendary battles with censors, advertisers and network executives. The mix of radical comedy with revenue concious TV executives makes for fascinating reading.
The chapters dealing with the deaths of cast members and behind the scene staff members are incredibly poignant, especially Belushi's and Chris Farley's, bit of whom were known to be dancing with trouble.
This book also goes a long way to humanizing Chris Rock, who emerges as one of the most thoughtful and career minded members of all SNL casts. His intelligence shines through in his tales of making it by way of the show.
There is a great story on almost every page of this book, and having grown up with this show, it made the memories all the more pleasant.
This is a great Christmas present for any 30-50 year old who has spent their Saturday night in front of a TV.