| List Price: | |
| Price: | $15.00 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details... |
| You Save: | $0.00(0.00%) |
| Binding: | Kindle Edition |
| EAN: | |
| Feature: | |
| Label: | Penguin |
| Publisher: | Penguin |
| Studio: | Penguin |
| Tags: | treasury royal scandals shocking true stories history wickedest weirdest most wanton kings queens |
Editorial Reviews
Related Reviews
Lots of fun for royal watchers
Farquhar provides a handy family tree for major royal families at the beginning--it's most helpful when the scandals reach a dizzying pitch and you need to sort out which royal is plotting to overthrow/marry for money/murder which other royal. He debunks an awful lot of incorrect gossip (like the oft-told tale of Catherine the Great's predilection for beastiality) and comes up with wonderful gems of dirt that will be deliciously unfamiliar to most readers. This is not a scholarly work by any means--it's kind of like a historical PEOPLE magazine, focusing on the faux pas, the foibles, and the fevered doings of all sorts of royals throughout history. Great good fun!
It's quite amusing to read about priviledged folks of history and their quirks and picadillos. They may have been 'royal', but many had the morals of an alley cat and the compassion of a viper.
Recommended!
steamy, sexy, enlightening and educational
Farquhar's gift is not so much for digging up tales of shame, but for the irreverent sarcasm with which he dishes them out. Of King Frederick William of Prussia: "The reply [to his son] was written in the glowing warmth of the third person." "Peter the Great was what might be best described as a super-tsar." [Groan.] "If Louis XIV was France's Sun King, then his brother, Philippe, duc d'Orléans, was its Drag Queen."
Sarcasm and bad puns aside, let's get back to the comparison to The National Enquirer. Unless you are truly the type who subscribes to Playboy/Playgirl for the articles, chances are that you read The National Enquirer for the titillating hints of the scandals, improprieties, infidelities, gifts to the Democratic Party, and other acts calculated to provoke moral outrage that today's royal icons, celebrities have virtually trademarked.
If you have any common sense (and how would you? Look at what you're reading!), of course you realise that little of The National Enquirer is burdened by the weight of the truth, but it is seasoned just right to tempt your sense of gullibility. (For example, a cover lamenting Cher's "heartbreaking disease"-surely cancer, or at least diabetes?-led to a story about her deadly adult acne problem.)
Farquhar takes much the same approach to his subject. Royal Scandals is replete with "reported that" qualifiers as well as apocryphal stories. Perhaps the most obvious is the one about the assassination of England's Edward II, or rather the description of the gruesome way in which it was allegedly committed. You'd be hard pressed to find a historian who doesn't scoff at the anecdote, but you are guaranteed to flinch at it. Farquhar will have you hooked.
While Royal Scandals does not quite qualify as history-don't cite it in your next paper, kids-it may pique your interest in such characters as Bloody Mary, Mary Queen of Scots, the Virgin Queen Elizabeth, and the hapless Jane Grey (whose mother was, "by some accounts . . . romping with a servant fifteen years her junior" at the time of Jane's beheading).
When you've finished reading Royal Scandals, you'll realise Hollywood has nothing on history-or the embellishments thereof.
The appendices, showing British, French, and Russian monarchs, and a timeline of events in the western world are useful. An index would have been helpful as well.
Diane L. Schirf, 2 May 2005.
I'd really like to know what the first Pope John XXIII did..
familiarity with the bare bones of European history. Good light reading for a rainy day, and full of interesting tidbits, Farquhar's not writing a 'formal' history, but one which giddily languishes in the world of sex, torture, death and madness.
Covering both the well known classics of the genre (Henry VIII gets some 39 pages worth of the author's attentions), the reader
is also greeted with the little known and perhaps better forgotten tidbits of royal and papal indignities and misdeeds. Anyone who would really like to know about Catherine the Great's sex life, why Edward VIII really grave up his throne, or the Spanish prince so inbred that he could be his own first cousin several times over should really read this book.
It is however, not scholarly, and the decided lack of a note's section leaves a lot to be desired for anyone who would like to cite Treasury in any academic medium. All in all, though, nice light lecherous reading.
The national inquirer of history
Good, Quick Read... but it's not for history scholars
Anyhow, it was an enjoyable read. Sad at times, sometimes even disturbing, but for the most part is written with a witty dark humor that will make you laugh at even the most sickeningly, depraved noble. While Farquhar sticks to European royalty for the book, he does include an entire section on Roman Caesars, and early Popes, all of which easily out-deprave the nobles the rest of the book is about.
Each story is short, a sort of Cliff's Notes. This is especially true if you are familiar with some of the stories. For the stories I already knew, his facts were accurate, if a bit summary. This is good, because each tale is bite-sized, making the book good for niblet reading here and there.
The tales Farquhar chooses to tell are sometimes hits, and sometimes misses. I particularly did not see how the detailed accounting of the murder of the Romanov's really fit with some of the other stories, for example.
If you like a good scandal, need some quick reads for here and there, or have a fascination with the excesses that unbridled power brings, this is a book worth checking out.
We didn't learn this in school!
Hilariuos, quick & informative
it's not *always* good to be the queen
Mindless Entertainment - If Gossiping is your thing
Granted, there were some stuff that could be "proved", but much of what this book talks about cannot be proved one way or the other and is nothing more than a collection of he said she said gossip around the various towns or from the various nobles. And oftentimes the sources are the subjects sworn enemy! Of course the enemy is going to claim so and so is a pedophile, or was a murderous, tortuous monarch. Of course this isn't a means to ignore what they say or to discount it as a falsehood. Europe's past ruling families are known far and wide for their hobbies and past times, for their sexual desires and cruel interest in sport and torture, but Farquhar's book implies that this was how the monarchs and queens always acted and, as another reviewer states, ignores the good that many monarchs have produced (yes, even some of the murderous monarchs as well). Of course this would diminish the appeal that this book would draw upon.
After all, who doesn't like to read a good gossip? This is exactly what Farguhar has compiled, and is most definitely the feel of the book as a whole.
I give it three stars because it was a very light and fun read, something you can pick up while sitting on the toilet or as a light vacation read. I would not recommend to those looking for more a more serious look at history, even for those who are not familiar with the times at all. So, 3 stars for sheer mindless entertainment for a few hours.
3 stars.
History Comes Alive and in Such Amazingly Unexpected Ways!
Amusing and Surprisingly Informative
The book does a better job than most (almost all?) serious histories in providing timelines, family trees and other appendices that help you sort out the various royal dynasties. If you have been confused about the six wives of Henry VIII, or the War of the Roses, or the Spanish Habsburgs -- as examples -- you would be helped by reading this book.
Moreover, the editor probably wanted to get this to print quickly, which accounts for some of the poor writing and errors encountered throughout the book.
I will give the book credit for its enthusiasm in playing up the eccentricities of the various figures covered, but then again, I can pick up a copy of the National Enquirer and get a good dose at a fraction of the cost.
Not for serious historians; moreover, not for anyone interested in good history. This book is good for a quick, light read, with maximum entertainment value.
My wife is still shaking her head that I actually read the book to its end!
I was so excited to see that he had released a new book on American Scandals and I am ordering it today!
Shocking, Titillating and a Better Read than PEOPLE MAGAZINE
Hilarious, quick & informative
Okay collection of stories, but incomplete history
Sure, this book is fun, in a voyeuristic People Magazine/Entertainment Tonight sort of way. As case studies of family feuds, sexual deviance, gross lusts, wanton cruelty, and all the rest, Farquhar seems to have missed little. Monarchs, as a class, may not be inherently any better or worse than the rest of us, but they certainly have more opportunities to cause trouble. And it's as a collection of stories about individual monarchs that I would be willing to recommend this book. But not as a complete picture of monarchy as an institution.
This book is colored by the author's own biases. He describes monarchy in his introduction as 'ridiculous and past its prime,' and the royal families of the modern era as 'faceless ... bland ... inane.' Of course, everyone's entitled to their opinion. More serious, though, is that Farquhar believes the behavior he chronicles was 'typical of a bygone era' of monarchy at its height. In other words, before 'the twentieth century [became] a slaughterhouse for European monarchy,' *all* kings and queens were more or less like this.
That's just not true. Christian history, for example, is filled with stories of royal saints and martyrs. Members of royal families have not only supported science, literature, and the arts with their patronage, but -- from Prince Henry the Navigator to Emperor Hirohito -- have themselves increased the sum of man's knowledge. Even 'faceless, bland' royal bureaucrats like King George V or Emperor Franz Josef had much to offer their nations.
So, yeah. By all means, read this book. Enjoy it. Laugh at the stories, roll your eyes, be shocked or get angry. I did. But don't let it single-handedly color your opinion of monarchy. As Emperor Maximilian said, monarchs are people too. Some of them have been bums, simpletons, lechers, criminals, bores, eccentrics, or just plain nasty. But as much chance as monarchs have to engage in scandalous behavior, so too do they have opportunity to do good. And I'd bet you could fill a book at least as long as this one with the stories of those who chose the second option.
It probably wouldn't sell as well, though.
(NOTE: Since posting this review, I have read 'Royal Babylon: The Alarming History of European Royalty' by Karl Shaw. It covers much the same ground as Farquhar's 'Treasury,' but in a much better way. Given a choice between these two titles, I would definitely recommend Shaw over Farquhar.)
My only complaint is that it's a bit short, with only 323 pages counting appendices and bibliography. I would have loved a few more scandals. I'm sure there are many more out there.
I did, though, have a number of issues:
- A very European focus. You'd think at least Farouk of Egypt would get a mention.
- A very British focus. Excluding the Roman emperors and popes, almost half of the stories were about the Brits, and most of those about the usual suspects (Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Mary Queen of Scots, George III, Victoria). And how could a book on royal scandals not include Mad King Ludwig of Bavaria, Magda Lupescu, and Lola Montez?
- A very historical focus. Very little on the 20th century, and almost nothing on the current crop of Windsors and all their goings-on.
- A rather tabloid, very anecdotal style, with lots of hearsay and very little research or analysis to examine whether any of these stories were actually true.
- Very little tying the stories together. It's basically one tale after another, with no analysis in between.
- As mentioned above, the inclusion of Roman emperors and popes. Not sure they qualify as royalty, plus there's surely enough there for their own books.
- A surprising degree of anti-Catholicism. I realize there's plenty of fodder with quite a number of the popes, but even the popes who basically fueled the High Renaissance aren't spared:
"Many popes found it difficult to completely let go of the Dark Ages. Sixtus VI, for rexample, commissioned the maginificent Sistine Chapel - right around the time he gave his blessing to the Spanish Inquisition and anointed the murderous Torquemada to run it. His nephew, Julius II, patronized Michelangelo and Raphael - when he wasn't dressed in full armor and slaughtering his enemies."
Royal Babylon: The Alarming History of European Royalty is a much better bet.
The History your teacher never talked about.
The book is laid out nicely in different sections with different themes that are coherent and easy to follow even if you aren't a student of history and are unfamiliar with names from the past. I would highly recommend this book for anyone who would like to know how kings and queens, princes and princesses, and even popes lived out their outrageous lives that make today's world leaders incredibly dull by comparison!
Create your own review


